Richard S Russell vs Rob Foulds – Fact Check

Rob Foulds

In the wake of the local elections this year and the dirtiest campaign, from parts of the Labour Party, ever in Rotherham! Much has been made of the fact that Rob Foulds did not live in Rother Vale Ward where he stood as a Rotherham Independent candidate last year. Labour has taken every opportunity to draw attention to this fact believing that this would be damaging to Rob Foulds’s reputation.

Rob Foulds stood in the Rother Vale Ward, which he can see from his front window, because Richard Russell was a ‘bussed in’ Labour candidate from far away West Melton, just next door to Brampton Bierlow, part of the Dearne Valley and not the most ‘local’!

Richard Russell Deselected 'Dud'

Richard Russell was also a decidedly poor candidate, rejected by his home ward of Hoober, where  Labour Party members deselected him after 28 years as their councillor because they already had quite enough of this insufferably arrogant, ignorant and greedy**(See note below) Councillor, whose abilities appear to be in inverse proportion to his ego! A right numpty, in fact!

Interestingly and very illuminating, Richard Russell always gives as his address Wath-upon-Dearne. Say that to the neighbours, and they will tell you they live in West Melton or even Brampton Bierlow! What planet is he on? His wife Pat is also a councillor, representing the far away Silverwood ward. There seems to be a pattern emerging don’t you think?

The fact that Labour members from the Rother Vale ward selected this dud, previously rejected candidate, to represent them is evidence that Labour is completely contemptuous of the voters! And the stupidity of Labour members in Rother Vale was also made abundantly clear by their outrageous choice.

Another factor was also important for Rotherham Independents, the clamour from residents of the ward for a more able and local candidate. The resentment in the ward, even among fiercely loyal Labour voters was clear. This was eventually persuasive and crucial in deciding to contest the Rother Vale ward last year, I understand. This resulted in Rob Foulds reducing the Labour majority and gaining 1,700 votes, quite a surprise in this most tribal of Labour seats and with the backdrop of a simultaneous General Election, very surprising indeed!

Chris Read - Wickersley's Local Candidate?

When it became known that Wickersley Labour Party had selected a candidate with no local connexions, from far away Swinton, Rob decided to take a stand on this issue and made it an important plank of his campaign! Rob Foulds lives in the Wickersley ward and was fully entitled to be aggrieved that Labour was not fielding a local candidate but one from the only point where Rotherham, Barnsley and Doncaster meet, the Dearne Valley! To add insult to injury, Chris Read cannot drive, which will make serving the residents, difficult if not impossible, in the long term! Wait until winter comes!

Labour made the decision to do everything to conceal this fact from the Wickersley voters, the issues involved will be explored in detail in a later posting. The result reflected this but Rob’s vote put him in second place pushing the Tories into third place! Quite a result!

Notes: Greedy** Richard Russell made into third position in the greed list for last year receiving a total of £29,127.72 and Pat, his wife and fellow councillor, received a total of £13,640.64. Between them they got £42,768.36! Plus any benefits accrued by sitting on outside bodies, a not inconsiderable sum to add to their pensions! No wonder Richard Russell and Pat Russell became ‘carpet baggers’ to get on the Council, in Pats case, or to stay on after being deselected by Hoober ward members who know him best!

16 thoughts on “Richard S Russell vs Rob Foulds – Fact Check

  1. “insufferably arrogant, ignorant and greedy” used to describe Dick Russell, you practically praise this man! What do you think you are achieving with these compliments?

    Like

  2. Clarification;

    “I think Mr Foulds general attitude should have been a major issues and his home address.”

    Should have read;

    “I think Mr Foulds general attitude should have been a major issue and not his home address.”

    Sorry about that.

    I note that, once again, folk are jumping in with feet forward, without actually stepping back and considering the facts, weighing up the pro’s and con’s, thinking ‘what if…?’ or looking outside of the box.

    If people actually read my comment I am not praising Cllr Russell, merely making the observation that Mr Fould’s has an undesirable attitude so that should stop him from becoming a Cllr, and not his home address. I have indicated quite clearly that people making a hoo-ha about an address is quite silly and detracts from the real issues of the day.

    Like

    • Dear Patrick,

      Ataboy you’re now playing the man and not the ball 🙂

      I’d simply love to know what part of Mr Foulds’ attitude is undesirable in your opinion.

      I obviously don’t know him as well as you seem to … please don’t keep me on the hook … help me out a bit bro, spill da beenz, pleez 🙂

      Like

  3. “I note that, once again, folk are jumping in with feet forward, without actually stepping back and considering the facts, weighing up the pro’s and con’s, thinking ‘what if…?’ or looking outside of the box.”

    I pronounce Community Champion this weeks winner of The Most / Worst Cliches award !

    Like

  4. “merely making the observation that Mr Fould’s has an undesirable attitude so that should stop him from becoming a Cllr”

    This has not stopped many a Labour councillor from being elected !

    Like

  5. Richard Russell was always trying to get on the union am manvers main colliery years ago,he was not liked then either…the man is scum.

    Like

Leave a reply to communitychampion Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.