Rotherham’s Disgrace – The questions begin? FOI 166 – An answer of sorts is received!

Don got his answer:

On Wed, 27/6/12, Corbett, Sarah <Sarah.Corbett@rotherham.gov.uk> wrote:

From: Corbett, Sarah <Sarah.Corbett@rotherham.gov.uk>
Subject: FOI Request 166
To: DON BUXTON
Date: Wednesday, 27 June, 2012, 10:33

Dear Mr Buxton,

I refer to your recent request for information regarding the article in the Star newspaper.  Please note that some of this information is not held by Rotherham MBC.  The information is held by Rotherham Local Childrens Safeguarding Board (LCSB) who operate as a separate legal entity from the Council.  However, the Council will respond on their behalf and I can therefore provide the following information:

1. The total cost of the High Court injunction and any and all of the cost of legal advice and/or opinion given to RMBC from either within or without the organisation, in relation to the Serious Case Review mentioned in the article.

A high court injunction was not obtained.  The cost of the legal advice has not yet been calculated, therefore this information is not held by either the Council or the LSCB.

2. Please provide a specific itemised cost and date breakdown in relation to the legal costs requested in (1) above.

Please see response to (1) above.

In accordance with the procedures of Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (RMBC), I am advising you that the cost to the authority in responding to this request has been £30.09 which reflects the staff time and administration costs involved. RMBC however does not currently make any charge to customers for processing Freedom of Information Act requests.

If you are not satisfied with this response you have the right to an internal review by the Council.  Please contact us via the above email address or by post to Sarah Corbett, Information Governance Manager, Legal Services, Riverside House, Main Street , Rotherham , S60 1AE .

If you are not satisfied with the internal review, you can appeal to the Information Commissioner.  Contact details are: Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane , Wilmslow, Cheshire . SK9 5AF. Telephone 01625 545700. Alternatively go to http://www.ico.gov.uk/

Yours sincerely,
Sarah Corbett

Information Governance Manager
Information Governance Unit
Legal Services
Resources Directorate

Don Buxton replied thus:

Dear “Corbett, Sarah” <Sarah.Corbett@rotherham.gov.uk>

Thank you for your half-hearted attempt at answering my FOI

1. I will continue to press RMBC on this specific matter until I have been informed what specific legal costs RMBC has incurred as indicated in my original question

2. I also dispute your ridiculous spurious notional cost you attribute to my FOI enquiry and I require you to provide me with an itemised breakdown as to how your organisation has reached this fanciful notion

3. Surely someone at RMBC is “having a larf” when they can’t measure the legal costs that I enquired about, but some civic beancounter can assess my FOI at £30.09

Yours Sincerely,
Donald H. Buxton

Previously: Rotherham’s Disgrace – The questions begin?

2 thoughts on “Rotherham’s Disgrace – The questions begin? FOI 166 – An answer of sorts is received!

  1. The response and the fact RMBC will calculate the cost of a FOI request while failing to manage the detail associated with a serious case review (SCR) speaks volume about Roger Stone, Martin Kimber, the majority of Elected Members and the perverse culture of the organisation.

    What is becoming increasingly worrying is the total news blackout from RMBC on any issue relating to the more recent SCR, you have to wonder why, is there another case waiting to be published, another civic failure by Stone or are Elected Members being gagged?

    Like

    • Hiya Cerberus,

      I think you may have unwittingly hit da Laybah nail smack on da Laybah eeud with the words: “are Elected Members being gagged?”

      You seem to have cottoned on the fact that Town Hall Towers and Da Rovrum Laybah Grooip ain’t as secure as GCHQ

      Of course the person who could, should, but maybe won’t have the plums to confirm this is our new local Stasi Laybah Grooip spokesMs who clings more firmly to Da Partee Line than dung to a babbiz nappee.

      Anyway, I digress, but while the Stalinist OGPU grip of silence and mind-control is maintained over Da Corn Fed Grunters, Muppets and Clowns, just content and amuse yourselves with this piece of literary political eloquence from my unfortunately ineffective and silent, but newly-elected Ward Cllr, Ms Emma Hoddinott – http://labourlist.org/2012/04/3-lessons-from-bradford-west/

      I wonder if she got permission from hersenn, n Da Dodger, to write these Party Faithful lines, or is it a case of “Do As I Say and Not As I Do?”

      Rovrum – a town dats gud ta junket in, feast in, get shedloads of ackers for being a Corn Fed Grunter, Muppet and Clown, and where Active and Empowered Citizens can get a good belly laugh from Town Hall Towers, ho ho ho, he he he, ROFLMFAO 🙂

      Like

Leave your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.