Libraries – Don Buxton asks very good questions

We bring you the latest in this series of correspondence with respect to the Libraries Consultation and the Assessment of Local Need. Latest first, as usual.

Don Buxton responded thus on Thursday, 12 July, 2012, 19:03, in his inimitable style:

Dear “Murphy, Bernard” <Bernard.Murphy@rotherham.gov.uk>

Thank you for your comprehensive, confusing and highly obfuscating response.

You have spectacularly failed to demonstrate or answer why my highly successful and well patronised library at Wickersley (RMBC’s figures – not mine) is to be disadvantaged in favour of the much lesser used and much less successful library at Aston (RMBC’s figures – not mine).

Once again, I request that you specify in clear, exact and unambiguous terms exactly why my Wickersley Library is earmarked for a reduction in hours.

You have stated: “The proposals are based on an assessment of local need for the service, rather than purely current usage. This includes the development of a number of ‘hub’ sites across the Borough( currently proposed  for Wath, Riverside House, Dinnington and Aston) These sites would have extended opening hours and also offer access to additional Council and partner services”.

Please provide me with an electronic copy of the specific document “Assessment of Local Need” to which you refer. You may wish to refer this to your FOI colleagues for their assistance, but either way, this is not a request it is a DEMAND for the document/report to which you refer.

If my wording and requirements are in any way unclear to you or your colleagues then please don’t hesitate to contact me by e-mail.

Yours Sincerely,
Donald H. Buxton

On Thu, 12/7/12, Murphy, Bernard wrote:
From: Murphy, Bernard <Bernard.Murphy@rotherham.gov.uk>
Subject: RE: Assessment of Local Need
To: DON BUXTON
Date: Thursday, 12 July, 2012, 18:31

Dear Mr Buxton,

Thank you again for your interest in and contributions to the consultation regarding the current review of library provision.

First of all, it is important to stress that at this stage we are considering a number of proposals and that any decisions will only be made by elected members once feedback from the public consultation has been analysed.

Following the decisions by members to review the service (November 2011) and to take proposals out to public consultation (June 2012), we are expecting to present the results of public consultation to them in the autumn.

The challenge presented to the Library and Information Service was to deliver a modern, vibrant library service within the resource available to use.  We have therefore considered the need for, the usage of and the accessibility of the service across the whole of the Borough when drawing up proposals.

Proposals also take into account the Library and Information Service Strategy 2011-15, which was developed following public consultation and is available on the Library Service’s website. (www.rotherham.gov.uk/libraries). This also sets out the priorities for the service.

The context for the review is a recent period of positive investment in our library service in terms of bookfund, construction, modernisation, replacement and refurbishment including the opening of six new libraries in as many years. (Thorpe Hesley 2007, Wickersley 2008, Mowbray Gardens 2009, Aston 2010, Riverside and Rawmarsh 2012). We are proud of our library service in Rotherham and hope that this review will equip us to continue to provide a modern vibrant library service across the borough.

With regard to Wickersley Library specifically, the Council contributed around £570,000 to the cost of the capital development of the site and continues to support the service with an ongoing revenue contribution.

The proposals are based on an assessment of local need for the service, rather than purely current usage. This includes the development of a number of ‘hub’ sites across the Borough( currently proposed  for Wath, Riverside House, Dinnington and Aston) These sites would have extended opening hours and also offer access to additional Council and partner services.

It has been demonstrated in the past, in a number of other local authority areas, that changes in opening hours can actually maintain or increase usage, so long as the hours  are the right ones. So for example, if the library is very quiet on one day, then moving some of those hours to another day or evening could open it up to more people within the local community. As part of the consultation, we hope that local people will contribute their local knowledge/community background.

Thank you once again for your contributions to the debate so far. I hope that you will be available to attend on July 17 at Wickersley Library so that we can listen to and record your views on potential opening hours for Wickersley and all the Library Review proposals.

Bernard Murphy
Manager : Library and Information Service
Cultural Services
Environment and Development Services
Rotherham MBC ,3rd Floor, Wing A, Riverside House, Main Street
Rotherham S60  1AE

Previously: Libraries – Assessment of Local Need? Consultation Events.

2 thoughts on “Libraries – Don Buxton asks very good questions

  1. This is utter drivel and little wonder libraries are closing if this is indicative of the way that they are managed.

    And I wonder if the irony of his title has been realised “Manager : Library and Information Service” – er, INFORMATION ???!!!!

    This man has cited ‘information’ which states “The assessment of local need sets out the key findings arising out of relevant data” – so where the hell is this “data”.

    Like

  2. It seems some what incongruous that he should state that Dinnington will be a so called hub site and will get more hours. The town council is protesting to the borough because they are cutting the time Dinnington library is open.

    Dave Smith

    Like

Leave your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.