Integrity! Integrity! Integrity!



Local planning authorities need integrity

Thursday, 02 August 2012

Chris Shepley (Planning 13 July) helpfully reminds us of the integrity and rigour of PINS. We need these qualities in LPAs and his comments should prompt us to look at how they measure up to them. I fear some would be found wanting.

While recent cuts, and those to come, will have severe consequences, we must ask: even before the Coalition Government, were some authorities adequately resourced? Local plan preparation is to be expedited. Many authorities will have to use consultants, a second best solution, but one in which professionally informed, in-house, guidance is essential. Will it be in place?

Some authorities undertake consultations subject to a fee. It is not unknown for a development manager to be given a target for application fees. Actions such as these and the attitudes they reflect are an affront to public service.

One suspects that many councillors, perhaps some planners, fail to see that the introduction of application fees, now irreversible, was a deplorable step, perhaps the start of a distorted view of service provision. The rot set-in long ago and some now see planning as a means of trading a permission for various benefits, and to hell with standards. This is an approach which could be attractive to cash strapped authorities: the control of development as a revenue/capital earning opportunity. Failures, since 1947, in the need to find political agreement on recouping some of the enhanced value of development land is no excuse.

Yet another trend inimical to good practice can be seen in placing the planning function into the hands of some chief officer devoid of any relevant experience or qualification. This damages career structures and can readily lead to the head of service being seen as a ‘fixer’, an officer more responsive to political whim than consistency and good practice. A professionally led planning department will more readily save time and costs for the benefit of all.

We have always had those in the development industry who approach planning and environmental protection as predators. Do some in the public service feel justified in taking a comparable attitude, as it were, from the other side of the fence?

Many thanks to our observant source, for bringing our attention to this, rather thought provoking piece, from Planning.

3 thoughts on “Integrity! Integrity! Integrity!

  1. Wow, what a powerful and chilling article.

    It brought back the uncomfortable and disturbing memories of the Corn Fed Grunters, Muppets and Clowns and their craven cowering Officers in Planning, along with the Cabinet Member Guru for 1st Class Rail Travel who wanted to shaft RDGH for a quarter-of-a-million quid for a Section 106 Agreement to permit planning permission for onsite development of better hospital parking for hospital patients and visitors.

    They squirmed and wriggled with irritation and indignation when I outed their odious little plans with an FOI and coverage in the Tiser. The Cabinet Member Guru for 1st Class Rail Travel in particular didn’t like having his tail tweaked. ROFPMSL 🙂


  2. Pmsl- whoever you are Mr Graldhunter you have an excellent way of using the vocabulary in a most eloquent and inventive way to get a very serious point across. Having read some of your posts, I think you should start writing for a living, you would be a best seller in no time.

    Keep up the great work.


Leave your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.