The odd couple or in flagrante delicto or who is using who – Part 2

The MP’s primary responsibility is to the people, not a Council. It’s a common mistake to presume that Council & the people are the same thing, with always the same interests; but not so where a Council has so clearly failed our children, admitted as much and lost trust.

Our MP had a chance to be a people’s Champion, the independent who stood up for justice and the good of everyone. Someone to help scrutinise the Council on our behalf.

By aligning with this shoddy “everything is now fine campaign” (or allowing herself to be perceived as) orchestrated by Akhtar and the Labour Group she has become simply “one of them. See Akhtars tweets on the subject and the link to his Press Team.

Launching herself as the fighter against child sex abuse on the national stage always looked a bit silly from someone with so little experience; representing a town that clearly has made so many mistakes, and has so much to make up.

Whether she likes it or not it will be perceived nationally and locally as a PR move to help the Council and Akhtar out of a fix. With all that is coming up in the future her rather thin defence will soon be drowned out, and when things really are clear who will trust her to help build our future?

We’ve never wanted a PR fix, just justice and the knowledge that our children are safe. For us justice is not the “Icing on the Cake” but a fundamental building brick in creating harmony between races, colours, religions and sexes. The failure here to deliver justice and equality of justice has done more harm for community relations than anything else I can remember. It is embarrassment to the Pakistani which the vast vast majority do not deserve.

It is an Akhtar perpetuated myth that this is solely about race, when for the vast majority it’s about access to and equality of justice.

Most of the “improvements” cited by the Council are procedural, with no obvious or publicly reported performance benchmarking against other Towns or over time. This added to the Council campaign generates more suspicion. That they do so little to keep us informed and redact every review to the point of meaninglessness creating a knowledge vacuum that people populate with suspicion.

There is a myth being perpetuated that the past (now set by Akhtar for personal political purposes as pre 2009) is somehow another planet, where laws were lax and professionals didn’t communicate. One unnamed Policeman stated that “back then” Police had never heard of or understood child sex grooming, that to them it was just slappers getting what they wanted from a bunch of lowlifes.

Personally I, and I think many social workers and police officers will be offended by this type of attitude.

It is not true. There were clear laws to protect children; guidance was available, procedures for communication between Social Workers and Police in place. Both had rules about maintaining records and both services had child sex abuse specialists available. Any Policeman or Social Worker had more than adequate access to knowledge as to what was and wasn’t acceptable.

As far back as 1974 a Social Worker and Team Leader in Birmingham were sacked for allowing a runaway teenager to be fostered by a former prostitute (note former, not even current.) Never mind active pimps and drug dealers. Now it is a casework example used on many social work courses.

It’s been a crime as far back as I can remember for a 24 year old to have sex with a 14 year old, never mind help her break a Care Order.

So the question is who decided to not apply the law? Why and how were abusers allowed to go unpunished? Given that not simply procedures but also the law was breached how can we have confidence that a pile of additional procedures will be implemented unless there are punishments for failure to do so?

Sadly this cannot be washed away as simply a systemic problem. Individuals gave instructions, made decisions and made choices. Professionals in effect colluded in the breach of Care Orders and failed in their duty of care. Policemen chose not to apprehend law breakers….

and they must remember that carrying our orders is not a defence in law.

I don’t know what to conclude about our MP who I believe to be a good person; but if supping with the devil she needs a longer spoon.


3 thoughts on “The odd couple or in flagrante delicto or who is using who – Part 2

  1. Many, many questions that need answering, but if as you say reports have a tendency to be havily redacted, who can have any faith in us geting the answers. In my experience an MP’s first resonsibilty is to cover their own back and make sure their interests are well protected. There’s ample evidence from MacShame’s past behaviour of that, but our present MP has not been in office long enough for any major blame to be attached to her.Though whilst taking a close interest in what is happening now, she does need to distance herself from some of the people who appear culpable for the egregious shameful way they failed to protect vulnerable children. If a whitewash is all that comes out of this many of the people in this town will be outraged!


  2. WILL I dont want to be nasty or nothing.
    But whatever your saying it is all true, I would love to meet you man, the stuff your quoting is very precise to the point and really interesting I dont want to say this but your telling the truth.
    everythink you wrote I fully agree and back you on this issue, your doing great work, keep up the good work.
    It is true about Councillor ASBO Akhtar and his crew there let us down and our community with their mistakes.
    I want to know what has Sarah Champion done for the community of Rotherham, since she has been elected, no sign off what she has done.
    she has not done much in parliament read this
    Is this the lady who labour party voted for she has done nothing since she has been elected for Rotherham nor has she voted in parliament please.


Leave your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.