Our esteemed Town Clerk is adept at changing argument when the last one is shown to be based on fallacy!
I publish below, each of the three reasons provided to Peter Thirlwall by way of explanation for his continued banishment from the Town Hall.
Martin Kimber’s advisers need enquiring of, with reference to their competence, if they offer three explanations, at least the first two without benefit of legal justification?
Reason Number One:
Reason Number Two:
Peter Thirlwall responded thus:
Reason Number Three:
There is evidently some moving of the ‘goal posts’ to say the least. What do readers conclude?
Previously on Rotherham Politics: