Two meetings that should be of interest to readers, especially given they have turned the cameras off.
If the Labour Group continue to oppose the cameras, we should film it ourselves!
Next Council Meeting
Wednesday, 22nd October, 2014 2.00 p.m.
Next Cabinet Meeting
Wednesday, 15th October, 2014 10.30 a.m.
If you know of a meeting or event in need of publicising? Drop us a line Rothpol.
Published previously: Openness, transparency – not in Rotherham Labour!
Rotherham Politics 
The rape of 1400 girls and women probably rises to the level where it could be prosecuted, in legal terms, as a Crime Against Humanity. I wonder if the next meeting of the council will address this issue. See more at:
http://tinyurl.com/mvbabmf
LikeLike
TSEC
Almost certainly not.
LikeLike
Thanks Tom for this link to TSEC ( Terrorism and Security Experts of Canada) The Rotherham Police, Social Services and Council must ask other professionals such as the TSEC to judge whether this crime does constitute a crime against humanity. It ticks all the boxes to me as such.
Please read TSEC@TomTSEC lik and judge for yourselves folks.
LikeLike
Linda, the Terrorism and Security Experts of Canada appears to be just one man with an conspiracy obsession – particularly in regard to the Muslim Brotherhood. Google can only come up with 30 results for this organisation – all to similar sites and which is probably the number any random set of 4 words would generate for google.
LikeLike
Thank you… Will check this out RR. Internet a good resourse eh… The TSEC may or may not be a bona fide organization… We need to be discerning, which was a missing element in the Rotherham professional organisations for years.
Incidently, James Cole was only ‘one ‘ man trying to draw peoples attention to what can accurately be described a massive crime against children. Not something we expect in a civilized society.. We need to be mindful that often it can be one brave lone voice that draws our attention to injustice . Just because everyone believes something doesn’t make it true; and just because a few believe it doesn’t make it false. I like the old saying ” one man and God is the majority”
I can hear a few sniggers at that quote from the other side of the world… Time will tell.
LikeLike
@RR Just done a preliminary look at one web sight TSEC and nothing spooks me yet. Just viewed one person stating the obvious. Can’t see why he should be called obsessional conspiritist. I wonder if I am viewing the same sight as you. I will keep looking. As I say , some things have a ring of truth and some things don’t. Council meetings at Rotherham for instance don’t.
I think it dangerous to simply label people negative names ( ie Conspiritist, )so they will be dismissed by the masses as irrelevant to the discussion. There needs to be detailed argument as to why someone can be called an obsessional conspirator theorist. I don’t think that applies to the gentleman I just viewed on the youtube TSEC sight. We need to be careful with our labels eh. I include myself in that one…..Thanks for the dialogue RR
LikeLike
Linda,
– please use google to look for “crimes against humanity”, look at what crimes have been prosecuted (wikipedia has a list).
– ask yourself who could be brought to such a court from Rotherham, when so few have so far appeared in any court in UK.
– and then maybe google for Gukurahundi – what Mugabe did then has never been prosecuted.(I was in Matebeleland in ’83, maybe that’s why I use it as an example – and there are others on my personal list.).
________________________
James Cole – I’ve been wondering why such an explosive story has not been picked up by the Mainstream Media (MSM). I checked for any followups when I got up this morning, found nothing ‘cept this, read it all the way through:
– notice how one person queries it’s validity, and then how a acceptance of it on another forum (Rothpol I would think) is used to confirm it’s validity.
So I ask again, why has it not been picked up by the MSM? even as it stands, it’s ideal material for the so called Redtops.?
rr
LikeLike
Being confused about the Cole/Vice.com piece, I looked a little deeper.
Both the both the bi-lined authors are from UK, Ann Czernic is here: http://journalisted.com/ann-czernik , http://www.theguardian.com/profile/ann-czernik and here: http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/t96b7de-ann%20czernik – and put forward for the Orwell prize in 2013:
http://theorwellprize.co.uk/how-to-enterentries-2013journalism-prize-2013/
she is very very credible.
Pete Sawyer s not journalisted, but his self-penned background is here: http://newsconfidential.com/Who.htm , it’s Sawyer’s own site – containing possibly nothing other than his much earlier writing.
rr
LikeLike
RR. Been on wiki; much of it is too technical for me to understand, but if I understand some of it correctly The International Criminal Court broadened the definition of Crimes against humanity to include rape, sexual slavery and any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity. While it cannot be said that the Government or de facto authority ordered or approved of the sexual exploitation of Rotherham children it states that tolerance of it may constitute a Crime against humanity. I should like to pose this question to Rotherham , Police, Council and Children’s Social Services. Does ignoring the known sexual brutality of Rotherham children constitute toleration of a crime and if so ( if I am not mistaken) it may very well be considered a crime against humanity. I haven’t understood all your blog RR and I am afraid I don’t know what a Redtop is. Not a NZ saying…Will check out the Gukurahundi ref tomorrow but for now it’s night night from me.
LikeLike
Sorry “Redtop” = UK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabloid_journalism.
LikeLike