A self inflicted wound?

UKIP’s Rotherham election campaign was beset with problems, right from the beginning.

The problems started with the conference speech of Jane Collins. It is standard practice for political parties to have the speeches checked by lawyers before they are given. Jane Collins speech for and to the UKIP faithful in Doncaster was no exception. Despite being ‘lawyered-up’ before delivery it still invited the law suits issued by Kevin Barron, Sarah Champion and John Healey!

These issues were compounded by Caven Vines, in an interview broadcast on Sky News with Kay Burley. Again it is standard practice before national TV interviews for members of political parties to be briefed before going before the cameras. It has been confirmed by a member of UKIP’s Branch Committee who was present at the time that Caven was given some serious advice from UKIP before he gave the interview and fell into the trap he had been advised to beware of. This then resulted in the second set of libel proceedings to be issued by Kevin Barron and John Healey, this time against Caven Vines.

The third element of this tragicomedy concerns the selection of a UKIP Candidate for the Wentworth and Dearne Constituency. Initially Caven insisted on being the Prospective Parliamentary Candidate. UKIP then made the constituency a ‘target seat’ and Caven stood down and Martyn Parker was “chosen” instead.
I have it on the very best authority that the hustings at which Martyn Parker was selected have been described as “iffy” with ineligible members voting. In view of Martyn Parker’s assertions to the press that he was selected with 100% of the vote and the assertions of others who voted at those hustings that they did not vote for him there also seems to have been some issues with basic counting or votes going missing.

After Martyn Parker was de-selected we were given an explanation which now seems to diverge from reality. We were told Martyn Parker was unfairly treated by UKIP and a ‘favoured insider”, forced on them against their will.

It can now be revealed this ‘official’ explanation seems to be a little lacking in objective reality. Caven stood aside, because he knew he would not have the time to devote to a parliamentary campaign and Martyn Parker was substituted.

It is standard practice in target seats that Prospective Parliamentary Candidates are monitored. Political parties are investing a lot of money and have to protect their investment. Unfortunately, as it turned out, Martyn Parker did not make the grade. Crunch time came when a Wentworth & Dearne Candidate Councillor exasperated by the lack of replies to numerous concerned phone calls and e-mails regarding the lack of direction and progress complained direct to UKIP’s Head of Candidates about how these issues were jeopardising the electoral chances of all Wentworth & Dearne Candidates.

That left UKIP with a huge problem which they resolved by appointing Mike Hookem MEP as candidate, who went on to get 25% of the vote, no mean achievement in the circumstances.

3 thoughts on “A self inflicted wound?

  1. Thank you Rothpole for this information
    But I can assure you it is wrong and their is only two or three people going round making these false allegations a very bitter cowardly people who has not got the guts to make these allegations in person as they know they are false the hustings they referred to was conducted by paper ballot in a on view ballot box and overseen by persons from outside the branch
    So thank you for confirming who this person is we had our suspicions but now you have confirmed them
    So at our next branch meeting perhaps they would like to repeat the allegations to my face and the branch members
    I won’t hold my breath


  2. The sudden burst of threads that have appeared on here over the last few days regarding this and the discrediting of certain individuals appears to be too coincidental for this to be suddenly reaired. But I think the contents of the original posting and Cavens reply explains it all. I maybe wrong but reading between the lines it seems there maybe a very bitter and disgruntled w&d ukip council candidate who I suspect didn’t get elected who appears to have friends in high places I suspect that certain decsions that have been made regarding the recent seats giveaway have not sat very well no pun intended and it appears there maybe a conspiracy looming. Caven watch your back it seems the knives are out and maybe coming in your direction, I do hope I am wrong!


  3. Pingback: A picture tells a story? | Rotherham Politics

Leave your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.