Woman charged with child sexual exploitation offences in Rotherham

Woman charged with child sexual exploitation offences in Rotherham

A WOMAN has today been charged with a number of offences relating to child sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1993 and 1995.

Shelley Davies, 40, has been charged with conspiracy to procure a child to become a common prostitute and unlawful imprisonment.

Read on: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/main-topics/general-news/woman-charged-with-child-sexual-exploitation-offences-in-rotherham-1-7342219

12 thoughts on “Woman charged with child sexual exploitation offences in Rotherham

  1. U bit noisy aren’t u u want to no the background of her u no she’s white u like shitstiring on this blogs than help these people and make sure u put this message on the blog so other readers can comment on this


    • All will be revealed, when she makes her grand entrance at the courts, next week. The Police would’ve charge her if she as whiter than white and they had no evidence against her. Unlike the parents of the children that were abuse, who were in a torrent of despair, her parents will sink to the depths of shame. Perhaps, she will realise what she has done, but at least she’ll have a chance to defend herself, unlike those poor little girls.


  2. I want to know who are these people

    Qurban Ali, 58-year-old Karen MacGregor and 40-year-old Arshid Hussain??? where from?


  3. There is a Shelley J Davies, aged 40, registered at deleted, no addresses please unless published in a newspaper, Rik. (not saying it’s her but there’s only 2 “Shelley Davies” in Rotherham and this one’s aged 40 – take that as you want). Given she would have only been about 17/18 at the time it begs the question, at that age, was somebody influencing her to “procure a child” to become a prostitute? Would it have been someone her age, or older, or somebody grooming her too?

    There’s virtually no information to be found at all on her, it seems like since the crimes she committed occured back in 1993-95, she’s been living a quiet life. Again – not saying it’s her, but at the address listed there are another 2 males, and a female living there. So that’s a 40 and a 33 year old female, and a 32 year old male and another male of unknown age. Seems like quite a strange set up? Take it as you want from there.

    It would probably be helpful for someone to go view the court case on Tuesday.


  4. Perhaps someone could also look up who owns this property?
    Akhtar and his family are implicated in owning several properties across the borough as has been wrote on here before (https://rotherhampolitics.wordpress.com/the-rotherham-ex-files/the-leader-designate-jahangir-akhtar/jahangir-akhtar-the-unauthorised-version/)

    89 Pitt Street being one of them.
    Guess who the next door neighbour is?

    S61 2PB


  5. I would question the legality of giving out addresses, to encourage vigilanteism, especially Far Right racist crackpots, for quite a few reasons, the addresses given out may be people sharing the same names as the accused, so if someone acts upon that information, the runners of this site could end up in court, for instigating violence, whether the accused lives at that address or not.


Leave your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.