Pandering to the bloc vote again
Danczuk’s personal conduct is one thing, what matters far more is that he is an opportunistic fraud who deliberately diverted attention away from “Asian” grooming in his own constituency and of course much further afield. Danczuk has been heavily involved in East Lancs politics for many years – and yet it was only after the conclusion of the 3rd Rochdale grooming trial in May 2012 that he went public over it. Are we supposed to buy that? Are we suppose to believe that the only Labour councillor, MP, minister or indeed member who ever knew of the horrific decades long epidemic was Ann Cryer?
It is popularly supposed that Danczuk outed Cyril Smith – he didn’t, Smith had been exposed many years before by a Rochdale free newspaper
This was then taken up by Private Eye
So Smith’s proclivities were well known when Danczuk saw fit to attend a blue plaque ceremony in Rochdale in October 2011 in honour of the fat one.
It was 12 months later that Danczuk fearlessly “exposed” Smith under Parliamentary privilege and about 6 months after the conclusion of the 3rd Rochdale grooming trial when the lid was well and truly off “Asian” grooming and the Labour Party was looking for a handy diversion.
Then Danczuk “co-authored” the book “Smile for the Camera” about Smith(actually written almost entirely by his political aide Matthew Baker). This shifted the focus away from the grooming gangs and onto a dead political opponent – a process paralleled by the activities of Tom Watson(who has the same grooming gangs/bloc vote dynamics in the Black Country). Thus a huge diversionary smokescreen of media hype was manufactured to deliberately and knowingly divert attention away from what we now tend to call “Rotherham model” abuse.
Where should Dancuk have focused the spotlight if he really was a genuine abuse campaigner? What should he have written a book about?
The fat deceased cremated lard mountain, or the “free and respectable members of the community” in Rochdale(ex-DC Margaret Oliver) who remained unprosecuted, or indeed the continuing epidemic group/gang grooming abuse in that sadly benighted borough that was known to be on going?