Not all child sexual exploitation mirrors what happened in Rotherham, says new report

Not all child sexual exploitation mirrors what happened in Rotherham, says new report

Children at risk of sexual exploitation could be slipping through the net because they are not ‘stereotypical’ victims, a report has warned.

The charity Barnardo’s warned that not all cases of CSE mirror the abuse experienced in Rotherham, where a report found 1,400 children were abused by men of largely Pakistani heritage.

Boys and girls targeted by older women are among those who experts fear may not be identified.

Read on… http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/not-all-child-sexual-exploitation-mirrors-what-happened-in-rotherham-says-new-report-1-7804139

http://www.barnardos.org.uk/news/Victims_of_child_sexual_exploitation_overlooked/latest-news.htm?ref=114277

7 thoughts on “Not all child sexual exploitation mirrors what happened in Rotherham, says new report

  1. “Not all child sexual exploitation mirrors what happened in Rotherham, says new report”

    As nobody has ever said that it did or does this is a weasel straw man argument.

    I’ve seen it put forward a number of times, and generally by the same sort of people who consistently denied, and indeed still deny, the existence and/or scope of the horrific Pakistani grooming/rape epidemic – Berelowitz springs to mind. This is cant of the highest order.

    Javed Khan

    a very credible figure to be sure

    http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/birmingham-victim-support-boss-denies-6734658

    Like

    • Quite. Barnardo’s helped to keep this buried, this up at both national and local level. They had a bird’s eye view and made vague noises about “men” grooming girls. Those girls “slipped through the net” because Barnardo’s wanted to focus on “other models” of abuse. Problem is according to CEOPs the Rotherham model accounts for around 75% of gang rape and around 2/3 of all group abuse, even when the paedophile rings are added in. The children’s commissioners figures are less alarming but “the Rotherham model” is clearly a major problem by anyone’s figures. Barnardo’s need first to understand how they came to “miss” Rotherham before telling us we have paid too much attention to the lessons of the scandal. Rik, I can back up the complicity of Barnardo’s locally if you are worried about libel. The failings at national level are, as Parsonage points out, glaring and public.

      Like

  2. “Problem is according to CEOPs the Rotherham model accounts for around 75% of gang rape and around 2/3 of all group abuse, even when the paedophile rings are added in.”

    Have you got a reference/link for these stats please?

    Like

    • I’m still waiting for broadband. I don’t know how to link via iPhone. Try Fact Check (or factcheck) grooming gangs. A little confusion is created as an earlier 2011 set of figures from CEOPs put “Asian” offending lower, at just over a quarter. So it’s a big jump to the more recent 75% figure for rape gangs. The figures are not comprehensive and there’s room for dispute as to the extent (though not the fact) of “Asian” over representation. The term “Asian” in this context is now contested by non Pakistanis of course.

      Like

  3. Quite recently, have you noticed that there has been a concerted attempt, by certain people to confuse the picture of CSE. There you have Saint Sarah and new Labour covert Jane Senoir, claiming 14 year old boys, are watching too much porn on the Internet, drrrrr they Dads are worse. Now these same clowns, who knew nothing about the abuse of children, which has been going on for decades, cliaming these new forms of abuse. Are they really trying to convince the public, that there friends the Pakistani abusers are all reformed characters and respect women now.

    Like

  4. Pinochio comes to Rovrum

    Is barron and Healey still in denial?

    Weird how Cllrs, council and police officers and even family members who are Cllrs never raised the issue over 20 years on such a serious matter?

    Never raised at liaison meetings ?

    or over canapes or the Sunday roast or nut joint?

    Who do you think you are kidding….?

    Just the gullible voters

    Like

Leave a Reply to Giles Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.