Time for a reminder – Has anything changed?

Organised Crime, Azad Kashmir* & Child Sexual Exploitation

First posted September 6, 2014. Unfortunately there is little in the way of signs of progress from where we were when this post was first published.

“The Police showed her a map of the north of England overlaid with various crime networks including ‘Drugs’, ‘Guns’, and ‘ Murder’… and told …we’re only putting resources into catching ‘the ring leaders’ …..if they’re caught, your local problem [CSE] will disappear – The Jay Report

“the appeal of organised sexual exploitation for Asian gangs had changed…. it had been for their personal gratification…. now it offered ‘career and financial opportunities to young Asian men ……”- The Heal Report

Speakers have been out and about defending the Kashmir/Mirpuri or trying to lay false trials to lead us away from something even more sinister.

That is, the organised structure of local and national pimping by gangs and the linkages into drugs, slavery, racketeer landlordism, fraudulent charities and weapons.

For example, Akhtar’s close relative Ash Hussain ,named as grooming at last 18 young girls is also accused of drug dealing. The newspaper pictures of him wheelchair bound reflect that he suffered gunshot wounds in a fight with a Manchester drugs gang. Not one of Akhtars sons, he nonetheless gave Akhtar’s as his home address when hospitalised.

Money laundering is on a massive scale to recycle the profits of crime using the Pakistani banks where compliance with international banking regulations is less rigorous and funding Pakastani political parties and candidates.

When the Jay Report was released first reactions and community defences came from the usual triangle of Akhtar, Mahroof and Shaukat Ali. However, so discredited are they that their biraderi is now forced to put out younger, less well known representatives such as Muhbeen Hussain and others from the Akhtar/Ali/Hussain families. Do not be fooled, they are simply the next generation of misogynistic biraderi leaders, whose only value is that they are yet to be discredited.

They will not bring change to the community, nor will anyone selected by the traditional biraderi leadership whose objective is to maintain status quo and cover up the crimes & keep the community quiet.

Their line is playing with words, such as not knowing the “extent” of CSE. Rubbish and a devious attempt to disguise the truth.

“The local Asian community ……. rarely speak about them [the perpetrators].’ The subject was taboo and local people were as afraid the violent tendencies of the perpetrators as the young women they were abusing.”

“there has been a long-standing problem of Asian girls suffering abuse” “The report’s not come as a shock to me in terms that we’ve known about these issues for a number of years now….. It’s just a pattern of abuse that’s being repeated with another sets of vulnerable girls”

– Zlakha Ahmed, Apna Haq

The most amazing dissembler has been Lord Nazir Ahmed, who featured in the Dailly Mail blaming the imams and the mosques for their failure to educate and direct young men.

This is absolute tosh. Blaming the Kashmiri/Mirpuri Imams is like blaming a sheep for the disemboweling of a wolf. They are appointed and paid by the community, meaning the biraderi leaders themselves and they call the tune.

Note that the Jay report emphasised the failures of Kashmiri/Mirpuri Councillors, not the Imams.

Wil

*Azad Kashmir is in Pakistani held Kashmir and embraces the Mirpuri community’s homeland.

4 thoughts on “Time for a reminder – Has anything changed?

  1. “That is, the organised structure of local and national pimping by gangs and the linkages into drugs, slavery, racketeer landlordism, fraudulent charities and weapons.”

    Indeed, though some of the cases conform to Andrew Norfolk’s description

    “this is a normalised group activity-not among a major criminal gang, but among friends, work colleagues and relatives-that does not have the same sense of shame attached to it as would be the case for your typical white offender, who works alone because if he told too many people, somebody would report him”

    eg

    “Passing sentence on Monday, Mr Justice Thomas, QC, told them: “The attitudes that the majority of you have so clearly demonstrated to these proceedings have been contemptuous, disrespectful and arrogant on a scale that I have hardly seen before in many years of practice in criminal law. Exactly the same as your attitude to the 13- to 14-year-old girl who you all sexually abused and exploited for your own selfish gratification.”

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/08/twelve-men-sentenced-for-sexual-exploitation-of-keighley-teenager

    We are getting up to around 50 “localised grooming” trials – what proportion may be considered as “normalised group activity” for the purposes of “gratification”, and what proportion is related to criminal gangs who go on to traffic, pimp and prostitute the victims etc is anybody’s guess.

    The poltroon UK regime in its various manifestations has been asked to do the research – and completely unsuprisingly it hasn’t apparently.

    “the appeal of organised sexual exploitation for Asian gangs had changed…. it had been for their personal gratification…. now it offered ‘career and financial opportunities to young Asian men ……”- The Heal Report

    Sure, but this argues that the organised criminal gangs have in fact battened on to inherent proclivities within the community – and that it isn’t all about biraderi gang leaders, root them out – in some unspecified way – and everything in the garden is rosy.

    “This is absolute tosh. Blaming the Kashmiri/Mirpuri Imams is like blaming a sheep for the disemboweling of a wolf.”

    This gives them far too easy a ride – they’ve known for many years what was going on, they were part of the omerta.

    The Bradford “Streets and Lanes” project, a forerunner of “Risky Business” was set up in 1994/5, with an HO grant to Barnardo’s of £677,000 – street grooming must have going on in Bradford well back into the eighties. Ann Cryer begged them for help in 2003, they weren’t interested. It was only in 2013 that an anti-grooming sermon was read out in some mosques apparently. And this was only when the cat was well and truly out of the bag after some well publicised trials.

    I am reading “Broken and Betrayed” – Jayne Senior gives the clearest indications of collusion and conspiracy to bury the grooming horror amongst SYP officers and council apparatchiks, including intimidation tactics and the theft and destruction and fraudulent amendment of records. And the HO reaction to Adele Gladman’s reports is also deeply suspicious, including the chopping of funding from Risky Business – as they were also to do some years later with CROP(PACE).

    There are a lot of guilty people out there. And one wonders how much will there actually is in the putrid UK regime to act with any sort appropriate rigour. After about 20 months since Jay we haven’t even got any measly misconduct in public office charges as yet.

    Like

  2. Most remain ostriches with heads deep in a hole lost in their own imaginary space and only face reality when their heads are yanked up out of their hole by external events that are beyond control.
    So in answer to the question “has anything changed?” the answer must be “very little”!
    The response above by “hotspot” is symptomatic of the propensity of some to continue as if it is business as usual.
    However there may be winds of change blowing in from Norway and other places…

    Like

    • ‘The winds of change’ it seems may have to come from Norway because it certainly isn’t coming from this country – and South Yorkshire in particular!
      Ms May has decided she needs to investigate sexual attacks that have, apparently, been going on in schools for years, and the Commissioner of Police for South Yorkshire has approved the set up a panel of mainly muslim men to advise the police how to deal with right wing groups protesting against the CSE in Rotherham, after hundreds of muslim men went on the rampage following a peaceful Britain First march.
      So, Ms May is deliberately delaying the already massive investigation into this type of depravity, in the hope that she’ll convince the electorate that it’s mainly white men who commit these crimes, and the Minorities Panel will ensure that Rotherham continues to operate as it has done for the past 30 years, aiding and abetting the perpetrators in the practise of their special type of racial atrocity.
      My daughter and granddaughter live in Rotherham, and they will be voting UKIP, as the only party
      with a chance of getting in, who will hopefully address this problem. If Labour win again in Rotherham I’ll be advising them to move because it will be obvious that the people of Rotherham are happy to sacrifice their daughters on the altar of multicuturism that is leading them straight to Islam.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.