……….a warning from history?
Two cases that should serve as a warning to all politicians seeking redress through the Courts for Libel!
In cases of libel, the defendant inevitably, is going to investigate the claimants, as thoroughly as possible! The claimants will also do the same thing to the defendant.
Jonathan Aitken in 1999 and Lord Archer in 2001, ended up doing jail time for Perjury after winning their libel actions in court, because they were discovered, to have lied to the libel court.
History has a habit of repeating itself! Maybe, if only they had listened…….
Jonathan Aitken
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Aitken
Jeffrey Archer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Archer
In the case of Barron & Healey vs Vines, it would appear they were so keen to issue proceedings for libel, they omitted a pretty basic check on Caven Vines.
To ascertain whether, in the event of them winning their case, he would be ‘of good standing’, in the real world that means, Caven Vines had the assets to pay damages and costs.
They got that one badly wrong, when it emerged shortly after the conclusion, Caven Vines was bankrupt!
Rotherham Politics 
And Belmarsh was a home to look back on. Did not Mac Shane McShane or a similar name appear on Belmarsh files for financial irregularities.
I wonder?
LikeLike
There is quite a list of MPs during this century who have been jailed for one thing or another.
Archer and Aitken were jailed for perjury. Although the likes of Denis McShane (Rotherham MP), Eric Ilsley (Barnsley MP) and Eliott Morley (NE Lincs MP) were amongst others involved in the Expenses scandal and jailed as a result.
It is said that those elected since 2010 are more likely to be convicted of an offence than Jo/Joan Public.
LikeLike
The Claimants against Vines were CFA funded with ATE insurance. They wil have all of their costs paid for.
LikeLike
If Vines was a Bankrupt, how did he become a councillor?
LikeLike
You misunderstand, Caven Vines was bankrupted by the damages and the £250,000 costs.
LikeLike
To Barry Morton
And of course, this judgement happened AFTER losing his seat.
Try and keep up…..
LikeLike
But the action against him was brought a year before he lost his seat. If he appeals and wins he may hit the jackpot.
LikeLike
Going into this action with a CFA and ATE in place seems to suggest that they set out with one objective in mind just what were they scared off ???
LikeLike
The truth was what they were scared of and the truth will come out.
LikeLike