Andrew Norfolk on Sarah Champion – To change attitudes will risk offence

August 17 2017, 12:01am, The Times

To change attitudes will risk offence

Forced to resign for speaking an uncomfortable truth, Sarah Champion has fallen victim to the same liberal squeamishness that for years allowed street-grooming sex crimes against young white girls to flourish unchecked.

It is more than six years since The Times first accused national child-protection authorities of failing to tackle a hidden crime pattern in which gangs of men were feeding alcohol and drugs to children, often from troubled backgrounds, before subjecting them to sexual abuse.

On its front page, this newspaper wrote in January 2011 that in the relatively few cases investigated by police and brought to trial — our research identified 17 prosecutions from 13 towns and cities — the vast majority of the 56 convicted offenders were of Pakistani origin. To suggest that men from a minority ethnic community were significantly over-represented was incendiary, as was the immediate response of the former Labour home secretary Jack Straw. He said that some young Pakistani men in his Blackburn constituency viewed white girls as “easy meat”. Mr Straw was widely condemned for the remark.

It is true that the vast majority of child sex crimes in the UK are committed by white men. That applies to abuse online, in families, in institutions and sex crimes in which the victims are boys. Most such offenders, however, act alone.

When it comes to the group exploitation of teenage girls, that the pattern was indeed very different has been confirmed by an explosion in the number of prosecutions across England since 2011, including Rochdale, Rotherham and Oxford.

For at least three decades, the targeting of vulnerable white teenagers for sex planted such deep roots among a subsection of men, largely from one minority ethnic community, that it became almost normalised group behaviour.

Today, girls are still routinely shared among groups of friends, relatives and work colleagues who view them as worthless. Overwhelmingly, those committing such crimes are Muslim, predominantly of Pakistani heritage. The Times has called in vain for detailed research to understand why.

Were it ever commissioned, such work should address varying cultural and religious attitudes towards the age of consent and the still widespread impermissibility, within many conservative Muslim communities, of teenagers forming casual boyfriend-girlfriend relationships.

There is at play here a confusion of cultural and religious attitudes that fuels a twisted, street Islam in which conduct unthinkable with a fellow Muslim somehow becomes permissible with a non-Muslim girl.

How do we begin to change such attitudes if we dare not discuss them for fear of causing offence?

From… https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/to-change-attitudes-will-risk-offence-7rrfx8p75

Full story: http://wp.me/P1ko7Z-8C2

3 thoughts on “Andrew Norfolk on Sarah Champion – To change attitudes will risk offence

  1. I’m glad that Andrew Norfolk has chimed in, Could we finally be about to see the genie out of the bottle never to be allowed back in, ? Like most I don’t hold out much hope, but it seems momentum is growing for real debate, It’s already taken too long, and I dread to think of what pressure needs to be bought to bear on the Labour party, certain “communities” many “community leaders” and those MP’s who resolutely refuse to acknowledge the truth and the scale off the problem.

    We can only hope that the pressure builds, and that they are shamed into admittance, personally I feel that many of them, Barron, Healey to name but two have no shame, they’ll die before they admit the truth, the fact that they doubled down and sought to bully and silence Sarah Champion reminded me that like at least one of our police forces the Labour party seems to have “a mindset that views the exposure of a problem as more of a problem than the problem itself.”

    Like

  2. “a mindset that views the exposure of a problem as more of a problem than the problem itself.”
    How true ! Political pragmatism, damage limitation, reputation management and personal protection all have primacy over openness, transparency, accountability and honesty. This applies also to South Yorkshire politicians, police and public servants, who have failed so lamentably for decades. Suppression of evidence and truth, repression and victimisation of those who would tell the truth, and the creation and maintenance of a flood of propaganda ensure that the status quo is maintained. Meanwhile, children are continuing to be abused, and those who have been abused can not find solace, closure or justice.

    Like

  3. Pingback: The Week That Was – Last Weeks Top Ten 19th August 2017 | Rotherham Politics

Leave a Reply to pleasant Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.