Who really wears the trousers? Hoddinott perhaps?

A ‘macho bullying culture’.

Anyone who has taken any interest in the politics of Rotherham over the past few years will remember this witheringly accurate allegation levelled by Professor Jay in 2014.

It’s true that Chris Read has gone to some trouble to ensure that Rotherham is a less macho place these days, which is perhaps the only reason why we have Denise Lelliott bobbing and curtseying on the Front Bench like a simpleton on speed.

But Chris Read’s commitment to the eradication of the macho culture is perhaps best exemplified by the rehabilitation of his partner, Emma Hoddinott; former Press Officer to Roger Stone, as well as Deputy Leader to Paul Lakin. Emma Hoddinott, who in those two roles, is, allegedly, inextricably linked both to attempts to supress the writing of Andrew Norfolk, and to the commissioning of the reports that whitewashed the past.

Emma Hoddinott, who was forced to resign following the Casey Report which found leadership within the Council ‘Not fit for purpose’. Wil (12/09/17) quite correctly wonders why she has been allowed a second bite at the political cherry.

I have it on good authority that Read chose to ignore advice from some quarters of Labour Group, who suggested that the elevation of Hoddinott, may put him in the position of having a significant conflict of interest.  And he’s got away with it. So far.

But move forward a year or so, and there are growing rumblings not just about Hoddinott’s ‘micro-management’ and ‘meddling’ in matters that are not her concern, but also about her attempts to ‘bully’ fellow Labour Councillors by acting as some kind of self-appointed adjunct to the Whip’s Office.

Quite a turnaround for the ex-Unison officer who would have been the first to scream ‘bully’ at an over-zealous manager if there was any chance that this would serve her career advancing agenda. Poacher turned gamekeeper perhaps?

Now some might say that Councillors are big enough to look after themselves, and there’s some truth in that, though it would be a brave backbencher that put in a complaint about the Leader’s squeeze. But perhaps more worryingly, given recent history, whispers about bullying of officers, and political interference are also growing louder and more numerous.

Rumour is that this has led to the resignation of a senior officer. An officer whose appointment post-dates Casey no less, so some are speculating that the bullying must be of some magnitude.

But this is Rotherham we’re talking about after all, so I’m sure the whisperers will be quietened and a veil quietly drawn over the matter.  Because it wouldn’t do for it get out that it’s only the macho that has disappeared, and that the bullying culture still thrives down by the Riverside.

Or for questions to be asked about who really wears the trousers in the Leader’s Office. But these issues are important. Because, to coin an expression Hoddinott has probably highlighted in her handbook of key phrases to trot out at feminist events, the personal is political. Very political as it happens. And that’s why Chris Read’s claims about how much the Council has changed ring so hollow. For given her far from glorious track record, and the chatter about current bad practice, his rehabilitation of his partner enables the ghosts of Roger Stone and Paul Lakin to continue to flitter around the Town Hall.

Pine Cone.

19 thoughts on “Who really wears the trousers? Hoddinott perhaps?

  1. A friend told me that there has been a notable change in officers attitude towards Labour since the gained ground in the last election and Labour councillors are back to their self satisfied,
    and yes bullying style. – leading to a “need” to be bias to projects and decisions by “the Party” as they are known.
    But now they’ve had their “retraining” its less obvious…

    Like

  2. Premature back slapping by the old guard following the publication of the nothing to see here, move along reports.

    The deep sighs of relief as the content of the reports were drip fed into the political playground that is RMBC may well turn to severe deep breathing as the victims lobbying for a criminal investigation gains political and public traction.

    Watch this space.

    Like

  3. Voting Labour in a general election is one thing
    But voting labour in a local election now most of Rotherham electorate know
    What went off and how they allowed all this to happen and still protect their own
    Is totally another I personally can’t understand how certain Labour Councillor’s
    Are still in post it really does defy all lodgick how decent family people could support such people
    I’m talking about politicians who knew what was going on and kept quiet about young girls being
    Groomed and raped
    I really can’t understand that can anyone please explain to me why they would support these people

    Like

  4. If Chris Read had any sense he would pass all the files to SYP and ask for a criminal investigation, he was not involved in the CSE scandal, for sure the old guard would have no hesitation what’s so ever in sticking the boot in.

    Or he could just sit back and wait for Inspector Knacker to give the old guard an early morning knock on the door with an invitation to an interview under caution.

    Like

    • Its a sham and a con foisted on the Rotherham electorate.

      Taxpayers in Wickersley should be made aware they are funding a never ending politica campaign for Read and Hoddinott to become Labour MPs.

      We of Rotherham deserve better

      Like

  5. Pingback: The Week That Was – Last Weeks Top Ten 23rd September 2017 | Rotherham Politics

  6. Pingback: The Emma and Chris posts | Rotherham Politics

  7. Pingback: The Emma and Chris posts – the rest | Rotherham Politics

  8. The Advertiser reports that Commissioners have agreed that Councillors can be given their full allowances again, after being at 50% when powers were taken from them on the Commissioners appointments – that is a big increase in this household

    Like

  9. ‘ Commissioners have agreed that Councillors can be given their full allowances again,

    In the meantime Hoddinott and her grasping cronies cry crocodile tears about lack of funds to pay for School Crossing patrols and other services..
    Labour councillors have decided to fill their wallets instead of fulfilling their public duty.
    They are still ‘Unfit for Purpose’.

    Like

  10. Pingback: The Week That Was – Last Weeks Top Ten 23rd December 2017 | Rotherham Politics

Leave your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.