Two areas of former green belt land, including one which straddles a village conservation area, have been approved for housing by Rotherham Council after they were made available for development as part of the authority’s recently adopted local plan. The … Continue reading
Residents from across Dronfield are to launch a campaign to protect the town’s ‘treasured’ greenbelt land. The Dronfield Greenbelt Residents’ are protesting against the district council’s plans to build 860 homes on the outskirts of the town as part of … Continue reading
An interesting snippet has arrived concerning an act of rebellion by Dinnington Town Council, at it’s meeting on Monday, 11th February.
The whole council spoke with one voice and rejected the complete Core Strategy of RMBC!
It takes a lot to get any council united in opposition in this way as the normal practice throughout Rotherham, is for this kind of RMBC proposal to be accepted, on the nod.
What has got them so upset?
It could have something to do with the anger in the town at having services stripped from them, being used as a dumping ground and of course the Greenbelt!
Published on Sunday 12 August 2012 09:12
RESIDENTS have met with council chiefs to renew calls for green fields between South Yorkshire villages to be removed from a list of potential sites earmarked for up to 1,100 new homes.
People living around Anston, Woodsetts and Dinnington are unhappy the area is still included in Rotherham Council’s Core Strategy document for future development despite objections during consultation.
The protesters’ concerns have been raised by Rother Valley MP Kevin Barron. Read on…..
A new round of consultations is due to be launched by Rotherham MBC on the future of Rotherham’s Green Belt. With the consultation set to commence soon, Rotherham Politics has been told that, “things are hotting up a bit on the issue!”
Part of the Dinnington and Anston groups preparations, is the creation by the campaign of their own Facebook page:
From the Advertiser website: Rotherham new homes target slashed.
A Rotherham Politics reader brings us news on the feedback resulting from the consultation on the LDF:
I’ve just found out that the consultation process of 2011 feedback report has been published: link, http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/6243/feedback_report_january_2012.
I’ve had a quick look and it is obvious that the majority of points raised for Dinnington East (Page 17 onwards), if not all, come from the ‘Save Our Greenbelt Dinnington and Anston Action Group‘ letter of objection (of which over 1700 were handed in) but with two omissions (must be considered too trivial to include, perhaps) viz:
“Pressure will increase on emergency services, schools, doctors’ surgeries and local hospitals” and
“In the unfortunate event of Yorkshire Water’s pumps failing (as happened in Goole on the 3 August 2011), the traditional pond will no doubt form, as now, in the bottom of the fields LDF216 and LDF220 with potential flooding to homes in Birkdale Avenue, Wentworth Way, Turnberry Way, Moortown Avenue and Belfry Way”.
The objection letter of the group can be found here:
Rotherham’s gem, the ‘Tiser, brings us this encouraging sign that ‘people power’ is beginning to bear fruit:
Published date: 03 February 2012 | Published by: Gareth Dennison
MORE than 7,000 people have swamped Rotherham Borough Council with comments on plans to build thousands of new homes.
Now councillors have promised to look yet again at revising targets for new housing under Rotherham’s Local Development Framework——a 15-year plan designating various areas for housing and industrial use. Read on……………
Darren Hughes, RMBC Councillor for Anston & Woodsetts Ward who actually lives in Catcliffe, has been reported to have worked tirelessly behind the scenes to facilitate this locally unwelcome application for development, in part of Rotherham’s precious green belt at Anston.
Why did he support the Exclusive Brethren’s planning application?
Perhaps it was for the following reasons, in no particular order:
- It will provide much needed education for the children of his Anston & Woodsetts constituents?
- It will enhance the site by destroying valuable wildlife habitat?
- The local roads are under used?
- It will advance Rotherham’s equalities Agenda?
- Labour’s own national education policy supports this?
- The education on offer will be fully compliant with the National Curriculum?
- Science teaching will be excellent?
- There will be many jobs for local constituents of Darren?
- LGBT isues will be dealt with sympathetically?
- The Exclusive Brethren are not a ‘cult’ that splits up families?
- The local community will benefit and welcome this development?
- The school will not be engaging in ‘brainwashing’ amounting to ‘child abuse’?
- Local businesses will benefit?
- Information Technology and computer science teaching will be ‘World class’?
- It will provide Rotherham citizens a new place to get married or enter a civil partnership?
- It will provide another place of worship, welcoming to all Christians?
This by no means exhaustive list of questions can only be answered in the negative, so why has Darren Hughes been so supportive of the Brethren’s proposals? We have a right to be told!
‘Useful Idiot‘ is one possible explanation, there are others much less charitable to Darren Hughes. Darren Hughes’s, Anston & Woodsetts constituents are waiting for answers! See comment below.
That application to remind readers what the Exclusive Brethren want:
Application Ref – RB2011/1568
Date Valid – 03/11/2011
Case Officer – Leanne Cain
Applicant – Elsworth Acres Ltd
Proposal – Erection of 2 No. buildings to form independent school, convention centre and gospel hall including associated car parking, landscaping and surface water retention pond and erection of ancillary caretaker’s dwelling including detached double garage
Property land at – Todwick Road
District – North Anston
Consultation_Period – START 11/11/2011
Consultation_Period- END 02/12/2011
Provisional_Decision- Date 02/02/2012
Planning Documents Make Reference To The Following –
Full application, for the erection of an Independent School, Convention Centre and Gospel Hall. Car parking, area for coach parking, informal play areas, caretaker’s dwelling, surface water retention pond and associated landscaping. Provision For 186 Cars and 8 Coaches. Provision For 4 Bedroom House
Not just a school then but a whole complex!
A reader writes (as dictated over that wonderful invention the wireless telephone):
“No wonder he was prepared to sell us out on this! This loathsome local politician won’t be affected. He should be ashamed of himself. Can’t wait for May so we can tip him out!”
Thanks to Trambuster for the planning link, much appreciated. Rothpol.
It can be reported that the plans to build a school off Todwick Road with Common Road, Anston have been withdrawn!!!!!!
The advice from officers was for rejection. The decidedly unwelcome application was being fought by the the local community. The planning application, made on behalf of a religious ‘cult’ has now been withdrawn ahead of the planning meeting scheduled for next Thursday. Hooray once again!!!! The rejection advice should be interesting, bring it to you when we have it.
Is it too much to hope that the Brethren have forsaken Rotherham for good? Wherever they turn their attention to next, perhaps they will do it without destroying more of God’s wonderful World and certainly not on Rotherham’s precious green belt!
This must be a disappointment to Darren Hughes, as he was assiduous in their cause assisting them everywhere he could! Darren Hughes is a RMBC Councillor for the Anston & Woodsetts Ward and was prepared to destroy important green belt land for a bunch of rather undesirable religious ‘cultists’, they are not called the Exclusive Brethren for nothing!
Darren’s constituents should remember this, when it comes to casting their votes this May.