We now have a range of representatives from the Rotherham Muslim community going around saying they didn’t know the “extent” of Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham. And that there isn’t a cover up issue within the Muslim community. I’m writing … Continue reading
This gallery contains 4 photos.
Rothpol has been sent this interesting letter from some, obviously concerned, members of the public determined to bring out the truth behind the façade: A cry for help, indeed!
This gallery contains 1 photo.
Asif it were yesterday: .
Quite out of the blue, Rothpol suddenly had a flurry of activity from an anonymous commenter recently. All three were left on the post, FOI – Two answers arrive! Taken together they are at least attempting to muddy the waters: “how … Continue reading
Rothpol has been increasingly concerned at this apparently blatant attempt to prevent discussion by of all people, Jahangir Akhtar: Anonymouse says: July 18, 2013 at 2:20 pm We have to accept that their is problem with issues with grooming? Due to … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
Rothpol understood there was a political dimension, even at his daughters wedding! Now we can bring you the evidence:
John Wilkinson has reminded us of the time when Jahangir Akhtar got his nickname.
From the Guardian:
Councillor joined drunken brawl
- The Guardian, Wednesday 19 June 2002 08.47 BST
A Labour councillor caught up in a drunken fight in a restaurant was yesterday given 130 hours’ community service.
“Jahangir Akhtar, 41, was spared a prison term because of his record of helping community relations in Rotherham, where the row broke out between diners last September.
Hull crown court was told that Akhtar, a member of the controlling Labour group on Rotherham council, played a leading role in kicking and punching a customer. Judge Simon Lawler described the attack as “a serious incident which led to a number of people being injured and needing hospital treatment”.
After the hearing, Akhtar said he would continue as a councillor. “I will serve my community no matter what happens. Whether that is in the Labour party largely depends on the reaction today.”
The court heard that Akhtar, a taxi driver in Rotherham, went to the Minar Balti restaurant in response to a mobile phone call from his brother Tesadiq Hussein, 31, who was drunk and abusive and falsely claimed that he had been attacked by staff.
Akhtar, his son Azzizum, 20, and his brother Shabbir, a 36-year-old martial arts instructor, arrived at about 11.30pm. Fighting broke out.
“Shabbir Akhtar struck a blow to a customer eating his meal and then Jahangir Akhtar joined in the assault on him,” said Rodney Jameson, prosecuting. “The man was kicked and punched and fell to the floor and was punched again. He got a black eye.”
Judge Lawler told Akhtar that he had been given glowing references including an accolade from a former police commander in Rotherham.
Hussein was jailed for 14 months for his part in the affray; Azzizum Akhtar was given 80 hours of community service and Shabbir Akhtar 130 hours”
One is forced to question why this bully and thug was ever allowed back in the Labour Party? This man and his sons are an utter disgrace and have no place in public life!
For students of Jahangir:
It is often the case in politics that when lawyers get involved in pursuit of their clients interests, against the wishes of a reluctant party, when it becomes public it doesn’t look good to say the least and is often … Continue reading