First off David Smith, who is standing for the Borough Council seat of Dinnington: Then Barry Kaye the Labour Candidate for the Keppel Ward: .
Nothing quite exemplifies the scale of Labour’s problems in Rotherham, than the list of Labour councillors, whose term of office expires next May. There are some real incompetents, deadbeats and worse, among this bunch. They are also all signed up … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
The Advertiser published this piece concerning the denial of basic rights:
Rotherham’s Labour Group Shabana Ahmed Jahangir Akhtar Shaukat Ali Jenny Andrews Lauren Astbury Alan Atkin Ian Barron Christine Beaumont Dominic Beck Alan Buckley Jo Burton Maggi Clark Simon Currie Judith Dalton Barry Dodson John Doyle Sue Ellis Jacqui Falvey John … Continue reading
Cowley Residents Action Group (CRAG) are getting ready for some serious action in defence of their environment.
From the Advertiser, get yours in the morning:
Legal challenge to coal reclamation scheme
Published date: 12 April 2013 | Published by: Michael Upton
CAMPAIGNERS are launching a legal challenge to a controversial coal reclamation scheme.
Cowley Residents Action Group is taking legal action against Sheffield City Council following its decision to grant planning permission to RecyCoal Ltd to reclaim coal from the former Hesley Wood Spoil Heap at Chapeltown. … Continue reading
Thorpe Hesley residents should be interested in this issue, after all, it affects them too! Wonder what position RMBC took? What do the ‘local’ Councillors!; Ian Baron, Maggi Clark and Barry Kaye, think? We should be told!
This latest task for Rotherham Politics readers may need to wait for the weekend for a detailed inspection of these important documents. Those who, perhaps surprisingly, have failed to declare hospitality, may ultimately prove to be the most fruitful? We shall see!
|Atkin A||Atkin A G&H|
|Doyle J||Doyle J G&H|
|Ellis S||Ellis S G&H|
|Foden J||Foden J G&H|
|Hussain M||Hussain M G&H|
|Kaye B||Kaye B G&H|
|Pickering D||Pickering D G&H|
|Russell P||Russell P G&H|
|Russell R||Russell R G&H|
|Smith G||Smith G G&H|
|Stone R||Stone R G&H|
|Wyatt K||Wyatt K G&H|
These documents should be studied in conjunction with these downloads: A job for Easter?
I suppose getting the worst result for a Labour MP, against a self financed Independent at the May General Election, might even get through to Denis!
As I promised readers, that I would publish the Advertiser letters on this blog, I now do so.
On 14th May 2010 The Advertiser published the first two letters I draw your attention to. Mike Britland’s letter makes an attack on the person of Peter Thirlwall apparently authored by him as a member of Joe public!
The truth, I believe, is much more interesting than that! Read on below.
Peter Thirlwall has evidently ‘trodden on someone’s corns’!!!!
I also reproduce my letter of the same date, thanking our voters and promising to be back next year stronger and more able to take on the forces of inertia that prevent real change from happening.
Peter Thirlwall himself made a response in the next edition of the Advertiser on 21st May 2010.
Time to establish some facts:
Firstly, the results in question
|General Election 2010|
The breakdown for Independent local election candidates in MacShane’s Rotherham Constituency.
|Rotherham Constituency Local Elections 2010|
|Rotherham Independent Candidates by Ward|
|Brinsworth & Catcliffe||594||10.6|
|Rotherham East||No candidate|
|Rotherham West||No candidate|
Rotherham Independents, you will note above, fought only three Wards out of seven that make up the Rotherham Constituency. Is the ‘MacShane Camp’ seriously suggesting that Peter Thirlwall only received support from the Wards where we had local government candidates?
This part of his argument is at best, seriously flawed at worst, a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the facts?
Research indicates that Independents do much better in local government elections than in General Elections. Why is this? The publicity that Independents can attract at the local level can be considerable compared with the exposure during a General Election where all but mainstream candidates are drowned out by the television campaign.
It was thus across the country, where without a campaigning group to back them, they polled on average a rather meagre couple hundred votes, even Esther Rantzen did poorly. Many Independent Network, Parliamentary Candidates indeed did not get even a hundred votes.
MacShane had promised a similar outcome in Rotherham, but the ‘I will wipe the floor with Thirlwall’ did not materialise. Quite the contrary, in reality, once the electors voice was revealed for what it was, a lacklustre electoral performance by a sitting MP, with only44.4% vote share a meagre 16741 actual votes cast.
This is a disastrous result for MacShane however you put it, a total of 10,111 votes have gone AWOL since 1997! The BNP and UKIP votes were not suppressed! Nothing to boast about there then.
Neither was Peter Thirlwall ‘put to the sword’ metaphorically. Peter Thirlwall’s 2366 votes, a 6.3% vote share, was the truly remarkable outcome in a national context therefore! The best result for Independents in comparable circumstances, anywhere in the country! and he easily saved his deposit of £500!
Denis MacShane is a record breaker and now has the singular distinction, of getting the worst result for a sitting Labour MP against an Independent, in the whole country!
Little wonder his ego was damaged and bruised!
|Mike Sylvester fought Wingfield as a full independent.|
|He is NOT a Rotherham Independent|
Below is the aggregated ‘Independent’ votes including Mike Sylvester, who was not part of the Rotherham Independents but shown here to give the lie to the erroneous claims in the letter of 14th May. It should also be noted that the ‘MacShane Camp’ are not very good with calculations, 2 plus 2 making 5 perhaps?
|Basis of claim in letter above.|
I thought it would be interesting and would complete my analysis if I presented the local election votes for the Labour Party for comparison.
|Rotherham Constituency Labour Vote|
|Cast at local elections May 2010|
|Brinsworth & Catcliffe||2610|
Not sure what they really tell us apart from the fact that Denis received nearly a thousand more votes than the local government candidates did on the same day.
I now turn to the claimed author, Mike Britland.
|Who is Mike Britland – The author of the letter of 14th May 2010?
Well, well! Mike Britland does not, after investigation, appear to be an ordinary member of the public, at all!
Certainly no unbiased commentator is Mike, but as I will demonstrate, he is revealed as a professional, Labour Party activist and member of the ‘MacShane Camp’!
As is this from Denis’s website:
“This site is using MelMel WordPress theme created by andrastudio. Promoted by Mike Britland on behalf of Denis MacShane MP,* hosted by one and one Internet Ltd”.
Finally for now, he shares the same home address as Labour councillor Barry Kaye, very much a Labour loyalist.
Mike Britland then, is not as presented to Advertiser readers. By omission, he misrepresented himself.
Did he also misrepresent himself as author?
Textual analysis would indicate that this letter was put together by more than one contributor and as we also now know that Mike Britland is a fully paid up member of the ‘MacShane Camp’, perhaps that is not surprising!
The pejorative construction placed on the use of words such as ‘charismatic’, ‘ego’ and ‘allowances’ and the general tone of the letter is deeply personal and may be the crucial clue as to why this was sent for publication.
Additionally, the author clearly harbours resentment at Peter Thirlwall’s high profile in the Advertiser!
The preoccupations that are being exercised here would appear more in tune with those known to be held by Denis MacShane than those of any third person? The spiteful nature clearly indicates that the ‘MacShane Camp’ was deeply upset by MacShane’s result and the magnificent 2366 votes Peter Thirlwall polled, very embarrassing!
I finish with this thought, I started with. It is worth repeating!
Getting the worst result for a Labour MP, against a self financed Independent at the May General Election, might even get through to Denis!
It has been revealed today, that Rotherham’s Labour MP, Denis MacShane is being investigated by the Metropolitan Police for his less than open and now it would appear, less than honest approach to his parliamentary claims.
The complaint of 7th July 2009 was indeed submitted by a BNP activist, who is being referred to as the ‘Sleaze buster’, one Michael Barnbrook. The responses to his original complaint can now be viewed here on the website of the BNP Reform Group. Despite the source of the complaint, we should all be grateful that this sorry saga is now to be thoroughly investigated. There are further issues, that go to the heart of our democratic procedures, that will be the subject of a later posting.
In the report of the 12th October Meeting, published 14th October, 2010 of the, Committee on Standards and Privileges reads:
‘the Committee agreed that the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards should report to the Metropolitan Police Service the conduct of the Rt hon Member for Rotherham, Mr Denis MacShane’.
This blog, Peter Thirlwall’s Parliamentary Website and Rotherham Independents has featured many of the questionable purchases made on Parliamentary expenses and has openly criticised him for this. Now we feel totally vindicated and Peter Thirlwall’s attempt to raise many of these issues during the General Election campaign now fully justified.
We warned the voters of the Rotherham Constituency and Denis Himself, that MacShane would be eventually forced to answer the many justifiable questions his constituents have asked him but have gone unanswered. Now it has come to pass! We are willing to present our evidence of MacShane’s less than honest or justifiable expenses claims to the Metropolitan Police who we feel confident will be asking Denis many questions and they will. no doubt, get the answers we were denied.
This slippery, oily, arrogant and self-aggrandising politician looks set to follow ‘Honest’ Eric Illsley, Barnsley’s own disgraced MP, into Court to pay the price for his wrongdoing, along with Elliot Morley, Jim Devine and David Chaytor as well as Tories Lord Hanningfield and Lord Taylor.
Now suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party and presumably the Labour Party, it is further evidence that Labour did a very poor job at vetting it’s candidates prior to the General Election and gives the lie to Gordon Brown’s claims to have done so, yet again Labour has let us down so badly! How many more greedy MPs will will come out of the ‘woodwork’ into the light one wonders?
Attached to his house in Rotherham just off Moorgate Road this is his rather expensive Constituency office in Rotherham.
No services are provided to this ‘office’ so without using his house attached his staff could not possibly work there! This may be a good time for Kath Sims, his secretary who works in this ‘office’, to look for a new job, I would have thought?
His brother, Edmund Matyjaszek, is also embroiled in this expenses controversy as Denis made a number of payments to a rather shadowy organisation called the European Policy Institute for ‘research and translation’. Headmaster Edmund, may come to regret this grubby little arrangement with his brother.
Many questions are still being asked about the eight laptops he bought from his parliamentary expenses, where are they now? Where have they been? Who has been using them? All unanswered.
These issues and the many other questionable expenses arrangements he has made over the years look set to bite him on the backside, big style!
We may now have a clue as to why he is so upset with IPSA and the new arrangements, making it more difficult to conceal any ‘Spanish’ practises from the authorities, perhaps?
In some parts of the Rotherham Constituency Labour Party there are quiet celebrations at Denis’s discomfiture and the sound of knives being sharpened ready for another attempt to rid themselves of this odious and disagreeable man, who they didn’t want in the first place. Power to their elbows I say!
There is also a small group of very embarrassed supporters who are ruing the day they signed his nomination papers only a few months ago. They should be suitably chastened, because their actions now look foolish indeed! I hope they are proud of themselves for the shame they helped to bring to our Town.
Roll Call of Dishonour, MacShane’s signatories to his nomination:
Anna Chester, Keith Brisland, Barry Kaye, Ian Barron, Julie Currie, John Foden, Ian Jones, Kath Sims, Richard Crow, Sarah Crow, Mahroof Hussain, Zlakha Ahmed, Tracey Jones, Nellie McHale, Christine Burgess, Quereshi Parveen, Diana Swanson, Roger Swanson, Dave Pickering, Subodh Kapoor, Jahangir Akhtar, James Burgess, Simon Currie, Rekha Kapoor, Stephen Parkin, John Price, Tom Henley, Craig Mitchell, Alan Buckley and Ruth Hobson.
In the Press:
Political parties throughout the country are beginning the process of choosing their candidates for next years round of local council elections.
This list below details the Rotherham councillors that successfully fought these seats the last time they were contested in 2007.
If this list ends up looking anything like next years field of candidates then both Labour and the Tories are definitely having a laugh at our expense! It must surely be time for some of of them to go if their respective political parties want us to take them at all seriously in the future.
Hens ‘earn their corn’ by laying eggs, when they stop laying, it is surely time for them to go!
So too it should be on the council, when they have out lived their usefulness, it is time for them to stand aside, not to continue on until carried out in a box!
Even the Labour Party insists that being a councillor is not a job for life, but it is a pity that the Labour Party’s writ does not run as far as Rotherham, never has!
Which is why we are landed with such poor candidates year after year because no one wants to give up their allowances that give them a good life. We must not forget the ‘State Funeral’ that is their due entitlement if they die in office. We must also not forget, that when there are ‘bodies buried’, it pays to be around lest anything gets out.
When a labour councillor dies, the relatives of the recently deceased are treated to an immediate search and removal of anything that appertains to the work on the council of their loved one, quite outrageous when you have seen it up close from the relatives perspective!
Anston and Woodsetts Ward
Iain St John – Labour -1394 (321)
Boston Castle Ward
Peter Wootton – Labour – 1282 (451)
Brinsworth and Catcliffe Ward
Reg Littleboy – Labour – 1515 (366)
Jane Havenhand – Labour – 1216 (427)
Brian Cutts – Conservative – 1516 (697)
Jane Austen – Labour – 1801 (713)
Jane Hamilton – Labour – 1531 (612)
Barry Kaye – Labour – 1190 (238)
Ben Slade – Independent – 913 (90)
Neil Hamilton – Labour – 1495 (673)
Rother Vale Ward
John Swift – Labour – 1461 (917)
Rotherham East Ward
Barry Dodson – Labour – 1312 (826)
Rotherham West Ward
John Foden – Labour – 1305 (369)
Roger Stone – Labour – 1088 (217)
John Gilding – Conservative – 1901 (967)
John Doyle – Labour – 1436 (729)
Paul Lakin – Labour – 1271 (668)
Gavin Sharp – Conservative – 1045 (322)
Alex Sangster – Labour – 1641 (717)
Peter Thirlwall – Labour (Sits as Independent) – 1329 (233)
Terry Sharman – Labour – 1411 (545)
For a quick look at photos of the Rotherham councillors all on the same page, not recommended for the nervous or easily shocked, you have been warned click here to view.
At first glance, there are an awful lot of very old pictures here, time surely for an update?