This post seems to have been on the money? Trades Unions foist Ed Miliband on Party! Huge Mistake! Constitutional crisis looms! Posted on September 25, 2010 by rothpol Trades Union leaders are already planning to take full advantage from their chosen … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
Another usually reliable friend has turned on the Labour Party, in the Chartists case, it is Ed Balls, who is currently under fire. Click on image to read:
Len McCluskey, Unite’s General Secretary writes for the Guardian:
Ed Miliband leading Labour to destruction, says union chief
Unite general secretary attacks Labour leader over endorsement of public sector pay freeze, saying it will prompt Blairite coup
The Labour party’s chief union backer has accused Ed Miliband of undermining his own leadership, disenfranchising the party’s core support and leaving the country with all three main parties bent on using austerity to save capitalism. Read on and weep………
Ed Miliband’s leadership is threatened by this Blairite policy coup
By embracing cuts, Ed Balls and Ed Miliband have left all those who stand against them disenfranchised
Ed Balls’s sudden embrace of austerity and the public-sector pay squeeze represents a victory for discredited Blairism at the expense of the party’s core supporters. It also challenges the whole course Ed Miliband has set for the party, and perhaps his leadership itself. Unions in the public sector are bound to unite to oppose the real pay cuts for public-sector workers over the next year. When we do so, it seems we will now be fighting the Labour frontbench as well as the government. Read on…….
Who said us bloggers don’t have a sense of humour?
“Every day, cruelty and mistreatment of Ed Miliband make his life a misery. His foibles, gaffes and occasional typos result in what might seem to many harmless banter, but cause a waking nightmare for Ed. We work to end this cruelty.” Read on……..
The first time a Labour Leader chose his own Shadow Cabinet, rather than by election among the labour MPs themselves, we get an uninspiring Leader choosing a pretty uninspiring front bench!
Most would struggle to identify more than a handful of Ed Milband’s pick for his A team. The new faces are simply time served party apparatchiks who have known little else but politics since leaving college!
This is probably the weakest Shadow front bench we have ever seen and inspire little in the way of confidence just at the time when experience may be needed.
Labour leave parliament with the disaster for Ed Miliband at PMQs still reverberating in their ears, a disaster for them on Europe, and if that were not bad enough, Labour is now firmly behind in the latest opinion polls!
No sense of direction is apparent and Ed Miliband’s leadership is turning into a disaster in much the same way Michael Foots leadership was a huge mistake!
Ed Balls, in his announcement before this years autumn conference that he no longer had ambitions to lead the party, was interpreted by most, as firing the starting pistol for the race to replace Ed Miliband as leader. At least, it was an open invitation for plotting to commence.
Yvette Cooper, no wonder she has not taken her husbands name, it’s Balls! Is said to be in pole position and the favoured choice of those who judge these things, especially the MPs! She will have to assert her political independence though, if she is to remain front runner at the end.
Many other political political careers, currently on hold, will depend on Yvette’s success. Why is John Healey not in the Shadow Cabinet? Is a question I have now heard many times. Was it the result of pure political spite on Ed Miliband’s part, as some have suggested for the support he gave Ed Balls? Whatever the reason, the Shadow Cabinet is the poorer without him!
Yvette Cooper, shadow Home Secretary and her husband Ed Balls, shadow Chancellor, both Yorkshire MPs, are in further difficulty with their expenses claims. It has emerged that Andrew Bridgen, a Tory MP for North West Leicestershire, has written to John Lyon CB, the standards commissioner (AKA the sleaze buster, by some) complaining about the high number of claims made by the pair for family travel.
The ‘Green Book’ allows an MP to be reimbursed for 30 journeys per child, per year.
The couple claimed for 375 journeys taken by their three children between 2007 and 2010 between London and Yorkshire.
This adds further to the recent embarrassment for the Yorkshire & Humberside Regional Labour Party after Eric Illsley, Elliot Morley and Denis MacShane! One by-election victory in Barnsley does not repair the damage to their reputation.
They still have to face up to the fact that the expenses scandal is not going away any time soon and won’t, until the past is properly dealt with and the expenses fraudsters brought to book!
Why are Cooper and Balls of interest to us? Yvette Cooper, threw her hat in the ring in 1996, for selection as Wentworth’s replacement Member of Parliament for Peter Hardy. John Healey won comfortably, Yvette polled just 14 Votes from a then membership of 900 plus. Oh dear! I did warn her!
Her exceedingly poor performance in terms of votes was affected by an indiscretion at a Brampton Parish Hall Christmas do, a fortnight before the final selection meeting. Yvette’s husband to be, Ed Balls, put his foot in it when he was overheard to say, “This was his first visit to Yorkshire and he hoped it would be his last!” Not the best way to endear yourself to a bunch of Yorkshire folk wanting to find a suitable candidate to be their next MP!
Trades Union leaders are already planning to take full advantage from their chosen standard bearer in Labour’s leadership contest and are as I write, in the bars, plotting to turn Ed Miliband into their prisoner. Beer and sandwiches anyone?
This is the first occasion that all the parts of the Labour Electoral College have not all gone the same way. Previous Leaders from Neil Kinnock to Blair had an overwhelming majority amongst Members, Parliamentarians and Trades Unions so this issue has not arisen before.
David Cameron and Nick Clegg must be rubbing their hands with glee at the numerous own goals this charade has ended up providing them with! Ed Miliband could end up a lame duck by Christmas or even earlier!
This will lead to a great many problems for Ed Miliband that previous Leaders did not have to face in uniting the Party behind them! MPs are most disgruntled at this outcome as are local members who mostly seem to have gone for David.
Civil war inside the Labour Party is the usual fall out from losing office. Only hunger for future Party success has a chance of maintaining unity. This will especially come under strain when Simpson and Co start applying pressure on MPs to toe the Unite, GMB or Unison line. Sources tell me that unkind comparisons to Michael Foot are the mainstay of many earnest conversations around the conference bars. Real anger mixed with despair are stalking the conference corridors. Delegates are already acutely aware of the consequences of the Unions victory because it will erode confidence in the long term and many are of the opinion that the next General Election was lost today. At this rate, civil war will have broken out by tomorrow morning, so much for unity!
This reaction from an unnamed but senior Labour MP:
“I think this will trigger a constitutional crisis in the party. It is complete madness that we can be seen to have a leader who was put there by the unions.”
From Tony Woodley. Joint General Secretary Unite:
“We welcome Ed’s victory – this is a fantastic achievement for him and for the policies he has been promoting. His victory, coming from nowhere a few months ago, is a clear sign that the party wants change, to move on from New Labour and reconnect with working people. Ed has won by hitting the issues people care about – stopping the assassination of public services, fighting for a living wage, standing up for manufacturing, a better future for young people. Now the party must unite behind its new leadership and take the fight to the Tories.”
From Dave Prentis. General Secretary Unison:
“Unison backed Ed Miliband because of the way he listened and understood the needs of ordinary working people. We look forward to working together to challenge the coalition government and its regressive cuts agenda. Under Ed’s leadership, Labour must offer an alternative economic strategy, promoting growth and recovery, together with fairness … As a priority, Ed must reconnect with Labour’s lost voters, including public sector workers, many of whom have been turned off in the past because they believed that Labour had deserted them.”
I saw John Healey on television and from his demeanour, he could not disguise his displeasure at the outcome, nor I suspect was he aware he was on television, Oh dear! Perhaps he was looking forward to the Shadow Cabinet elections to come?
The backlash begins, this from Sayeeda Warsi already:
“On behalf of all of us in the Conservative Party, I congratulate Ed Miliband on his election as Leader of the Labour Party.
He will have many challenges ahead in these next few days, but if he wants to be taken seriously, the first thing he’s got to do is own up to his role in creating the mess that Britain is in and tell us what he’d do to fix it.
From advising Gordon Brown in the Treasury in the 90s, to serving in his Cabinet in the 2000s, he must recognise his central role in creating the financial mess we’re all paying for.
For the past five months, all we’ve heard from Labour is knee jerk opposition to our plans to tackle the deficit. Now is the time for Mr Miliband to tell us what he’d do instead. He promised us a Labour spending plan before the spending review, now we’d all like to see it.
The new Labour leader now has a clear choice. He can either serve the national interest by joining with us and the Liberal Democrats and set out how he would cut the deficit, or he can stand on the sidelines and refuse to engage with the biggest challenge facing Britain in decades.
The fact that Ed Miliband owes his position to the votes of the unions does not bode well. At the moment this looks like a great leap backwards for the Labour Party.
After 13 years of Labour failure, we need your help to hold Ed Miliband to account.
And Guido Fawkes announced victory for Ed thus:
Unite’s massive effort to persuade disinterested union members to vote for Ed Miliband paid off. Ed won 50.65% of the vote. He lost in the MP and membership sections of the electoral college but took so much of the union vote it didn’t matter. The unions bought the election, endorsements and incredibly heavy promotion of their chose candidate paid off. Charlie Whelan and Derek Simpson can justifiably claim it is their victory, they got Red Ed the job…
From Toby Young:
John Rentoul of the Independent:
Those results in full:
Diane Abbott: 7.42% (0.877% from MPs and MEPs, 2.447% from members, 4.093% from unions and affiliated societies)
Ed Balls: 11.79% (5.013% from MPs and MEPs, 3.371% from members, 3.411% from unions and societies)
Andy Burnham: 8.68% (3.008% from MPs and MEPs, 2.849% from members, 2.825% from unions and societies)
David Miliband: 37.78% (13.910% from MPs and MEPs, 14.688% from members, 9.182% from unions and societies)
Ed Miliband: 34.33% (10.526% from MPs and MEPs, 13.821% from members, 9.978% from unions and societies)
As no candidate got more than 50% overall, Diane Abbott was eliminated and her second preference votes redistributed.
Ed Balls: 13.3% (5.171% from MPs and MEPs , 4.224% from members, 3.829% from unions and affiliated societies)
Andy Burnham: 10.41% ( 3.03% from MPs and MEPs, 3.298% from members, 4.078% from unions and affiliated societies)
David Miliband: 38.89% (14.015% from MPs and MEPs , 15.076% from members, 9.799% from unions and affiliated societies)
Ed Miliband: 37.47% (11.111% from MPs and MEPs , 11.13% from members, 15.231% from unions and affiliated societies)
As no candidate got more than 50% overall, Andy Burnham was eliminated and his votes redistributed according to preferences.
Ed Balls: 16.02% (5.429% from MPs and MEPs, 4.823% from members, 5.76% from unions and affiliated societies)
David Miliband: 42.72% (15.783% from MPs and MEPs, 16.076% from members, 10.861% from unions and affiliated societies)
Ed Miliband: 41.26% (12.121% from MPs and MEPs , 12.424% from members, 16.706% from unions and affiliated societies)
As no candidate got more than 50% overall, Ed Balls was eliminated and his votes redistributed according to preferences.
David Miliband 49.35% (17.812% from MPs and MEPs, 18.135% from members, 13.40% from unions and affiliated societies)
Ed Miliband 50.65% (15.522% from MPs and MEPs, 15.198% from members, 19.934% from unions and affiliated societies)
Ed Miliband passed the 50% threshold and declared the winner.