Towns like Rotherham, have numerous charities, local groups and clubs that invite on to their controlling boards, people who lend their reputations to these organisations. Rotherham seems to have far more, than it’s fair share of these charities and related … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
One from the Advertiser that strangely, was there one evening and then disappeared from their website the following morning, why? perhaps we should be told! .
Guido, first with the news, as usual. Lord Ahmed Resigns From Labour Party Race Row Resignation Letter in Full Dear Mr Wilson (National Constitution Committee of the Labour Party Secretary) I have been considering my position over the weekend and have … Continue reading
Received from William Ewart:
I sent this in the the Advertiser a couple of weeks ago in response to a bizarrely long defence of Ahmed in their Letters section
In that same week, before the Tizer’s story deadline, Ahmed admitted to The Huffington Post that he had made the comments ascribed to him in a media broadcast in Pakistan. Many thought these comments to be racist.
The Tizer did not cover this confession and apology.
I feel that the Advertiser too often lets the people of Rotherham down by failings in it’s journalistic standards. I do not blame the Tizer for not printing my letter, maybe it was too long? However shame on them for acting as his apologist which maybe acted to cover his potentially racist behaviour and apology.
Here is the letter I submitted:
“Response to The letters section Lord Ahmed’s Solicitor and friend have been given a far larger than average amount of space to defend his actions.
“I was always taught that letters to the Ed should be short, sharp, punchy and topical. Not long, ramblings by someones solicitor and a friend; ramblings that simply rehash old news.
We already know that Ahmed was not responsible for the death of the motorist. That his texting while driving at speeds up to 70 miles per hour on a rainy motorway was stupid, dangerous and illegal; but not a causal factor in the death. There it is said in two sentences.
These ramblings seem in your editors mind to outweigh the hot news, that in an interview to an internationally renowned news journal Ahmed “completely and unreservedly” apologised to “the Jewish community, to the judiciary, to the newspaper owners” for blaming Jewish-owned media organisations for his imprisonment for dangerous driving.”
His original words, spoken in Urdu to Pakistani media being perceived by some as a racist attack on the Jewish people, and possibly what lead to his recent removal as an ” International Expert “with the Institute For The Research of Genocide – Canada.
Is it a coincidence that his solicitor and a friend write such lengthy letters in the week when he has admitted to very poor judgement and an attempt to blame others for his actions? Could it be a smokescreen?
Your newspaper has a responsibility to investigate and report the truth, or if feeling lazy at least read other newspapers. This was a bit shabby.”
Rik, I am not a racist, indeed I think myself quite the opposite. What I really hate is politicians who play two faced games with their own communities. I am concerned about the quality of representation we get in Rotherham, regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation etc.
Labour peer Lord Ahmed suspended over ‘Jewish conspiracy’ claim March 14, 2013
Silly comment’s consequences March 22, 2013
My dear, put-upon Lord Ahmed March 24, 2013
Lord Ahmed apologises to the Jewish community March 28, 2013
No sign of the Jewish conspiracy here. Despite the obvious provocation, the JC is remarkably reserved in it’s criticism.
Caught exercising his “habit of telling a British non-Muslim audience one thing in one language and a Pakistani Muslim audience something else in another.” Ahmed has just gone too far this time, the Labour Party and Ed Miliband surely cannot allow any return to the Labour fold.
“Labour peer Lord Ahmed quits interfaith role,” Sacked from Interfaith Role, would have been more accurate! The JC did give him an easy ride after all. Info from comment.
Ahmed apologises ‘unreservedly’ for his anti-Semitic comments. Great: now Labour can kick him out
Apparently, Lord Ahmed has just apologised for his remarks about the Jewish community. In an interview with Mehdi Hasan in the Huffington Post, he says he “completely and unreservedly” apologises to “the Jewish community, to the judiciary, to the newspaper owners” for blaming Jewish-owned media organisations for his imprisonment for dangerous driving in 2009.
A bit more obliquely, he claims “he has “the greatest respect” for the Jewish community and could not “believe [the video] when I saw it”. He said his comments were “completely wrong”, “unacceptable” and the product of a “twisted mind” – but took “full responsibility” for them. Seeing the comments were his, it’s hard to see who else could be responsible. As for the “twisted mind”, well, you said it, m’lord. Read on……………….
From the Star: Disgraced peer issues apology
From the Yorkshire Post: Peer says sorry for his ‘Jewish conspiracy’ claim
Previously from the Advertiser: Rotherham peer suspended over new controversy
Very grateful to a regular reader for this information from the Times newspaper and researched and written by Andrew Norfolk, the award winning, Chief Investigative Reporter, no less!
Day Two with Opinion from Maajid Nawaz and Jahangir Akhtar, later.
Comments on, Naz Ahmed’s outrageous claims!, may interest readers.