How Sheffield Labour Council Harvests Its Poorest Citizens

How Sheffield Labour Council Harvests Its Poorest Citizens

What follows is but one aspect of the local Labour administration.

Where there exists an area that attracts funding, for example with high crime, or adverse Index of Multiple Deprivation, or poor community health, Labour’s usual ‘money-chasers’, supported and to a large extent Labour council controlled, move into the area.

What follows is a well-practised routine that has worked well for Labour, financing its private agenda, using money designated for the poorest to pay wages for non-jobs for its puppets and sycophants, and bankrolling its political self-promotion.

Already with a well-developed and secret plan, the party machine falsely claims to be the community leaders.

If any groups already exist, they are infiltrated for control or destroyed.

Existing, independent, successful groups, or genuine community leaders, are considered a threat and treated like the enemy.

FUD is often used – widely promoted Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt.

Targeted individuals, starting with the most vulnerable, are subjected to a variety of repeated and systematic abuses, ruthlessly and relentlessly imposed by Labour puppets who reap the rewards for their Labour loyalty when destroying their victims.

Often, the victims are frightened into silence, for fear of the inevitable reprisals if they disclose or resist, as has happened to so many others, as the Labour Law of Kill the Messenger reigns.

The destruction of individuals is fuelled by malevolent, politically-induced mass paranoia and hysteria against the targets.

Targeted groups are subjected to disempowerment, cash-starvation, sabotage, public vilification, and eventual destruction, by council officers and councillors, aided by a subservient press.

Sanction and Prejudice is Inflicted on the Basis of Unspecified Allegation and Innuendo about Issues and Concerns.

What more proof of guilt is needed – body language ? Already done!

The Antoinesque Labour controlled or created groups and Labour-stacked decision-making quangos are then falsely ascribed ‘representative’ status, and the targeted resources are channelled through these groups.

It is sometimes more efficient that an existing group can be infiltrated and taken over.

The common factor is that the Labour parasites use dirty tricks, confident that the party machine will protect and reward them.

The required consultation process is not started until the substantive decisions are made, with the following process engineered towards the pre-determined outcome, not least through the use of tactics such as control of the flow of information, or disinformation – all highly illegal, as consultation must be ‘fair’.

Having imposed a foothold in the area, and falsely claimed to represent the community to be milked, it is then falsely claimed that the necessary community consultation has taken place and also falsely claimed to have community consent.

It matters nothing that the community consensus is unanimously against the imposed group and imposed project, the Labour cash vacuum machine simply fabricates the documents.

In effect, the Labour group is only consulting with itself.

Even if there are established groups within the community that do not support the imposed project, it is falsely claimed anyway, thus riding off the backs of the genuine community volunteers who have a good reputation in their neighbourhood.

True community cohesion can never be allowed to happen.

The next phase involves the efficient extraction of any value from the funded project, with the resources used for a political agenda, to create non-jobs for their own, to further their self-interests, and progress the pre-set agenda.

What follows is a description of corrupt political Insider Dealing.

Many of the projects are so vague in nature as to be unmeasurable, thus ensuring that the inevitable false claims of success following abject failure are not challenged, as are the self-congratulatory public awards.

Of course there is a need for secrecy, the targets must never know.

Anyone with a Panglossian tendency who ‘susses’ the scam or publicly disagrees is ruthlessly neutered.

Political pragmatism, damage limitation, reputation management, and information flow control have primacy over honesty, truth, accountability, openness, and duty to citizens.

Once the money is gone, false claims of success are inevitable, even when the project is a disaster.

The result is that the community is left worse off than before the exploiting Labour group entered the neighbourhood to harvest the funds falsely claimed to be intended for the poorest and most needy.

For the evidence of the repeated failures, despite the tens of millions of pounds drawn to the deprived areas over the past decades, the IMD figures are self-explanatory.

It is in the interests of the self-appointed groups to ensure that the neighbourhoods do not improve, as such would kill their golden geese.

Of course, any disclosure of the truth – the scams – is met with Deny and Lie, followed by Control or Destroy.

Local leadership is top-down imposed, and true bottom-up is not allowed, as locally, Labour is the ultimate corporate bully.

Labour has never been able to cut the strings of absolute, total control, having become a dangerous cult.

What happens is the creation and maintenance of an illusion of genuine consultation and meaningful engagement, when the truth is the exact opposite.

The abused are demonised – the abusers are politically canonised.

Digging deeper, it cannot be criticised that the reality is that many of the problems were cynically created by Labour, or even purely imaginary, who then offered a ‘solution’, ( even if to a non-existent problem ) followed by suppression and containment, not least through the equivalent of political incest.

The above mechanism is repeated throughout the city, using any community group as its cash laundry, has operated for at least twenty years, and remains ongoing to this day.

There is no more stark and indicting evidence necessary than in the Index of Multiple Deprivation statistics themselves, which have been the subject of scrutiny for years.

Not only do the IMD figures expose the lie of the Labour claims of success, they also show that the most deprived areas continue to be deprived, and one case-study showed that the rate of increasing deprivation is accelerating.

The question must be asked, if these deprived communities are still deprived, what has happened to the tens of millions that have been spent?

Who has gained from the vast amounts of money ? – certainly not the vast majority of citizens condemned to live in ever declining neighbourhoods.

Complicit private companies have benefited, as have Labour activists who would otherwise not have a (non-) job, whilst Labour politicians have politically profited from the hubris and kudos that is translated into votes and thus power, via their new loyal ‘family’.

There is also a thread involving the organisation Common Purpose, but this is too large a subject to be discussed here.

What can never be allowed by the Labour control-freaks who are destroying the fabric of society is for communities to own and control their own agenda. Northern Powerhouse? Sheffield City Region? Local Enterprise Partnerships? – no chance of success !

A genuine, successful, bottom-up, self-empowered community group is perceived as a threat, because it proves that communities can do better without Labour council and political interference.

Is this corruption? Yes, and then but one aspect of the institutional corruption that is rife, lead from the top down, and out of control.

Being rotten to the core and from the core, everything it touches it taints.

Having neither the will nor ability to change, outside intervention is indicated.

Even the Stasi, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Stalin and Genghis Khan would be shocked at Labour’s antics of the false charities and not-for-profits.

The principles described above are not necessarily limited to the toxic Labour in Sheffield, but regionally also, in fact, at every tier of governance in the region and above, through the use of packed quangos, structures, mechanisms, and management devices.

The media bubble of propaganda is bursting, the schemes are unraveling, the decades of deceit are exposed, the emperor is wearing no clothes, the golden geese will stop laying.

Had the local and regional schemes been successful, would we be where we are today?

Locally, Labour is incapable of managing its own affairs honestly.

Locally, Labour first falsely accuse their targets of being and doing what it is and does, for example, describing its citizens as “an infection to be eradicated”.

Labour has created its Potemkin Village.

Throughout all this, the principle applies:

Those that fail to deal with corruption, or condone in any way those determined as corrupt, become, by definition, corrupt themselves.

Can anyone consider doing business with a council such as this ?

If it cannot manage its own affairs, how can it be trusted ?

Martin Brighton