Rotherham East Ward – Labour’s candidates revealed

Rotherham East Ward – Labour’s candidates revealed:

CanzVkVWwAIdaCv

Perhaps these three of Labour’s finest, would like to introduce themselves to our readers? Something in the comments should suffice.

Shakoor Adalat is the candidate it turns out, in addition to our old friend, Tajamal Khan, not pictured. Deborah Fenwick-Green, is the third candidate pictured centre. Zahir Munir, I am advised, was judged unsuitable for inclusion on this years panel of approved prospective candidates!

Thought readers might appreciate this photo whilst out campaigning in East Ward:

IMG_20160210_205927

These threatening comments, appear to emanate from the same anonymous individual, presumably trying to shut down legitimate scrutiny of this group of candidates standing in the Rotherham East Ward?

Anonymous says:

Any unpleasant comments made here be assured my legal team will take action.

Anonymous says:

Legal Action will be taken

Anonymous says:

Be warned legal team

Anonymous says:

You have to get facts right clever.
When you have no house left then you will find out pal

This kind of behaviour is unacceptable, especially so when this involves Labour Members!

Until each of these potential candidates repudiates their supporters engaged in this unacceptable behaviour and apologises for it, they will be damaged by it and less likely to win.

Should any candidates want to give us such a statement, please use the comment facility.

We have another Anonymous commenting, not a candidate statement but interesting nonetheless:

Well as a friend of Deborah and her husband, both very nice people who will be an asset to any ward and will work their socks off, Deborah has worked in the voluntary sector with vulnerable families for years and will be good for the ward and her husband is an Army veteran who broke his back serving for his country, reading the Jay report was the reason they took idea to stand in the first place, both will be equally good and both will be committed to what ever ward they get confirmed in should they be. Yes Deborah likes dogs, her dogs are lovely and work in the community with numerous rehab units and nursing homes and they have help raise thousands for charity over the years with Andrew’s hobby. I’m sure as can be seen from the fact Facebook profiles etc they are more than happy to be open about themselves and I’m sure people will see that when you speak to them on the street. I’m sure you will hear about them if and once candidates are announced. I’m sure they will pop up in pics around a number of wards as I know they have gone round many over the last few month campaigning. Judge them in 3 months once people actually know them, and yes they wear glasses which are reactive to the sun, not a case of something to hide! They may be new to local politics but you will find they will be very committed to helping the voters in their areas they may get to stand in. I would be proud to have them serve in my Ward!

Nothing yet from Tajamal Khan or Shakoor Adalat’s team. Nor for that matter, the Labour Party. I guess this tells us more than anything else, that the Rotherham Labour Party is no better than they were before? Un-reconstructed ‘scum labour’, it would appear, still to this day.

 

53 thoughts on “Rotherham East Ward – Labour’s candidates revealed

  1. When will some people ever learn. I thought the motto of the selfies is, never take them with Pakistani Labour members, your might be standing with a Child abuser from the past, especially if there from the Rotherham area.

    Like

  2. More puppets on short strings…
    And yes NEVER trust a person who wears sunglasses for a photo shoot!
    It’s not cool, trying to look cool…
    False prophets, false promises, false agendas –
    Next!

    Like

  3. So it’s true Emma Wallis off to Rawmarsh ward
    Well do the good respectable people of Rawmarsh want a Councillor who abandons them when they can’t hack the ward they represent she has abandoned the people of Eastwood after her party filled it with Eastern Europeans and the dumping ground it is
    Well I can tell her I doubt she will be welcome in Rawmarsh & Parkgate ward the good people of this ward want loyalty and Councillors who are their for them not run away when things get a bit tough
    So Rawmarsh you have been warned you deserve the best not the week to represent you

    Like

    • Now you insulting what one could find at the bottom of a barrel, she’s been seduced by the offer of free Curry meal at one of our venerable take always, without the spit, trimmings and safe passage home , by one of our world reknown and trusted a taxi Drivers. Labour is cheap, so anything or anyone will do.

      Like

      • Well as a friend of Deborah and her husband, both very nice people who will be an asset to any ward and will work their socks off, Deborah has worked in the voluntary sector with vulnerable families for years and will be good for the ward and her husband is an Army veteran who broke his back serving for his country, reading the Jay report was the reason they took idea to stand in the first place, both will be equally good and both will be committed to what ever ward they get confirmed in should they be. Yes Deborah likes dogs, her dogs are lovely and work in the community with numerous rehab units and nursing homes and they have help raise thousands for charity over the years with Andrew’s hobby. I’m sure as can be seen from the fact Facebook profiles etc they are more than happy to be open about themselves and I’m sure people will see that when you speak to them on the street. I’m sure you will hear about them if and once candidates are announced. I’m sure they will pop up in pics around a number of wards as I know they have gone round many over the last few month campaigning. Judge them in 3 months once people actually know them, and yes they wear glasses which are reactive to the sun, not a case of something to hide! They may be new to local politics but you will find they will be very committed to helping the voters in their areas they may get to stand in. I would be proud to have them serve in my Ward!

        Like

  4. Sadly, the tribalism of many voters will see Labour hacks returned.
    (Oh, there is tribalism amongst Tory voters too, so please make no assumptions as to my politics. Much of rural England demonstrates this.”

    Like

  5. “My legal team”? Is this that piece of lying, cheating scum Akhtar coming to life again or just one of his friends who was on the gravy train with him when he was pocketing our money? When will this scum learn that we CAN now say the words Pakistani Paedophiles and Islamic corruption. I wonder why? Because it’s true.

    Like

  6. shakoor adalat rotherham action group director was he not a lead role in trying to over turn landlords scheme ?? thats going to go down right well with eastwood residents has the labour party hq learned nothing ? shakoor adalat will only help pakistani landlords . who’s deborah fenwick ? hope she knows about eastwood and ongoing problems with the landlords .

    Like

  7. Where councillors leaving wards to go and stand in others is concerned one of the wingfield councillors is moving to maltby where he lives to stand this time round and as for the ladies of eastwood choosing who they vote for they will have to vote as they are told to vote. We then have the councillors who ARE still in denial about the past the commissioners have done nothing to earn the money they get afraid Rotherham will take a long time to recover, where a council pass a proposal to increase their debt just because they can is not very good the debt approx half a billion could rise to £650 million pounds so we have an increase of interest payments some of these debts are untill 2067 so much for this labour led council

    Like

  8. There can’t be many people in UK called “Deborah Fenwick-Green” but surely the prospective Councillor for East Ward cannot be the obsessive dog lover we find here; https://www.facebook.com/deborah.fenwickgreen
    and in Amazon UK’s reviews of doggy things
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A3V21XJ0Q4BESY/

    …and surely this cannot be her husband’s writing:
    http://www.yorkshirecosplaycon.co.uk/pdf/dalek-collection.pdf

    My conclusion has to be that there must be at least two Deborah Fenwick-Green’s in South Yorkshire, one of whom will be a superb councillor for Rotherham East, and the one I found on the web.

    Like

    • Are you a member, or organiser, or officer in the Labour Party, or a supporter of the Labour Party or in any way involved in Common Purpose?
      It is called declaring an interest.
      I declare I am not a member of any party not support any party.
      I am retired but was once a member of UCATT and when a member did not opt out of the political levy.that was back in the 1980s.
      Candid reply to this is not expected.

      Like

      • Sorry PM, but my post above was tongue in cheek. There is only one Deborah Fenwick-Green. Get it now?
        Apart from that, just sod off!

        Like

  9. Something for Rik to consider and the other ‘Anonymous’ who trolls on here with silly threats of litigation:
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/contents/enacted
    The Defamation Act 2013 contains a series of measures, including:
    Protection for those publishing material on a matter of public interest where they reasonably believe that it is in the public interest
    Single-publication rule to prevent repeated claims against a publisher about the same material.
    Justice minister Shailesh Vara said: “As a result of these new laws, anyone expressing views and engaging in public debate can do so in the knowledge that the law offers them stronger protection against unjust and unfair threats of legal action.

    Article 10 (ECHR) gives everyone the right to freedom of expression, which includes the freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas.
    In cases where free expression might be affected section 12 of the HRA requires courts to have particular regard to the importance of the right and to not impose injunctions without the other party being first notified unless there is strong justification for doing so.

    So to ‘Anonymous’- Memorise the words of Norman Tebbit (paraphrased)
    On your bike.

    Like

      • I thought we had enough problems with landlords, I can’t believe you said that Anon.

        Are you personally going to go round and seize properties. I hope your not one of the two (dicks) in the top photo.

        And good luck with my property as well. I’d give you the name of my landlord if I knew who you were.

        Like

      • Your puerile threats-on a public forum- illustrate you struggle to write anything resembling a coherent sentence or paragraph.
        Like all trolls you try to hide your identity and your posts(I use the term loosely) add nothing to this debate.
        Now drink your milk like a good boy and make sure you’re well tucked in.

        Like

  10. With “Sod off” it says itall. RR must be some sort of Labour Party or associated in some way bully.
    No candid answer was expected. No candid answer was received.
    Your role here seems clear to me.

    Go on answer “yes” or “no” Have you given up beating your wife?

    Like

    • Oh dear,
      Sorry I have upset you!
      I can honestly say that I am not a member of Common Purpose, nor ever been on a Common Purpose course. Equally, I know no-one who, to my knowledge is a member of Common Purpose. I do however know one voluntary sector CEO who gave two members of her staff time-off to go on a Common Purpose course.
      OK ?
      Now please just sod off!

      Like

  11. Now it would make you happy to upset others. Failed there with me.
    I note no mention of party affiliations.
    As for sodding off – no. Leave you a free field to intimidate. You seem driven to dominate and may well be a full blown narcissist. That is your problem.

    Like

  12. “Sod Off”………hardly what one expects from an urbane, sophisticated contributor off such superior standing . Methinks RR has been spending too much time researching web links and press content…..has he become unbalanced? ….was he ever balanced?

    Like

  13. Someone has been scouring my site. I don’t think it is a fan!
    Perhaps its the international banker, photograph copyright holder and general citizen of Oz.
    It does not seem to follow the Socratic system of debate nor Citrine’s book of chairmanship.

    Like

    • IF you have the IP address of the scourer – I’ll happily tell you if it was me (I do have a static IP address). .
      But the fact is that your poetry website is open to anyone to read:
      https://poetmorgan.wordpress.com/

      and you have openly publicised yourself in the recent past:
      http://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/13648392._Secret_War__veteran_from_Wellington_publishes_poetry_book_fifty_years_after_conflict/

      “Perhaps its the international banker, photograph copyright holder and general citizen of Oz.”
      I am not a citizen of OZ and have only spent 3 days in that continent in my entire life, but the rest is fairly accurate. So what?

      may I just say once again “sod off”.
      I do not intend to reply to any of your nonsense in the future, so just rant on as much as you like. .
      .

      Like

      • RR
        My, you have been busy scouring the web to hunt me down. What an obsessive personality.
        When I refer to Oz, you silly little man, I refer to that fantasy Land of L.Frank Baum with its yellow brick road leading to an emerald city. The Wizard there is a loud little person and a flimflam who leaves poor Dorothy to find her own way home. He is no help to a girl who is lost and wants to go home to Dear Aunt EM. (It is called symbolism, as a Literature and poetry expert you ought know that!)
        If you were that up in Banking you would know Baum’s books are allegorical tales about financial systems with silver slippers on a golden road and fiat money as flying monkeys. Industry is the Tinman and Agriculture the scarecrow and the Wicked Witch of the East are east coast banks that collapsed when house prices fell and mortgages defaulted in Kansas, etc.,etc.. (The house from Kansas fell out of the sky and crushed the Witch!)
        But then a bank’s janitor need not know this, nor about the bimetallism that Baum preferred.
        Oh, and to debate with you and to challenge you is not to rant, you do enough of that for everybody here as you must on all occasions be right: how sad, how vain.
        My poetry site was established in the USA by a relative but such details and other things about me are of no consequence nor relevant here. .

        I get what you are about. It is an old technique. You have problems with someone so do not counter with debate or ideas just find someway to nail the man. Oh, I have been there and got the scars.

        What an anger little creature you are.

        My passwords are now altered

        Like

  14. RR you have violated my express copyright in that above you have promoted my works. The relevant section that you have accessed is:-

    “Trevor Morgan is hereby identified as the author of these written works in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 of the United Kingdom and recognised by International Treaty.
    It is my express instruction that all of my works of poetry nor any extracts therefrom be not published, performed nor PROMOTED by any publisher or other media within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Nor may they be downloaded, nor saved in any way nor quoted from by any person real or legal within the United Kingdom.”

    I guess I could invoice this website if the link is not removed. But I lack the spite that you possess.

    Like

    • PM: It’s entirely your choice as to whether you want you poems to be promoted or not, but why hide your light under a bushel. I’m not really into poetry and I haven’t read all of them, but the ones I have read I thought were quite good and your poem ” The Children of Despair” was excellent.

      Like

  15. Pingback: Going’s on at Rotherham East? | Rotherham Politics

  16. Pingback: The Year that was 2016 Top twenty | Rotherham Politics

Leave a Reply to Hot spot Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.