A RELIGIOUS group’s plan for a church and football centre on green belt land have been recommended for refusal. Previous applications from the Plymouth Brethren Christian for a place of worship on Common Lane, North Anston, were rejected in 2013 … Continue reading
A Tale of Two Cities
(Well – Anston Nord et Sud)
Après La Fete National (Bastille Day 14 July)
Aujourd’hui – We are mopping up (today)
Lots of blood and gore ici
A member of the public asked:
Why is this fountain, in the cemetery, not operational.
It is disintegrating and why is this.
Cllr Dalton (Labour) accepted that this fountain has not worked since installation and became full of green algae because of this.
Q What expenditure has there been on this fountain
A Purchase of solar panel £700 – Installation cost approximately £2,000 plus various ongoing
maintenance costs – Total – Well over £3,000 and counting
Q How long has this been going on
A c 2yrs, maybe more
Q Why was it leaking in the first installation process
A Non-waterproof cement used!!
Q Why is it now disintegrating
A As Cllr Dalton admitted – The chemical they purchased to stop the algae was the wrong
sort and this is what is causing the disintegration!
Q SO – What are they going to do now
A The latest suggestion is – Ditch all that, fill it with soil and make it a flower bed!
Q So what are they going to do with the solar panel they purchased
A Computer says Don’t Knooooooooooooooow
More cost – Compost – Plants & ongoing maintenance
WHAT A BUGGERS MUDDLE – AGAIN
ANSTON TAXPAYERS LOSE OUT YET AGAIN
Madame was pushed up the steps-made to kneel, the crowd boos and the knitters cackle – will she lose her head!
ANOTHER COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CHAIRMAN – Cllr Beck (Labour) – Le Tricoteur – (Male Knitter)
Cllr Jepson (Independent) complained about the behaviour and inappropriate comments of the chairman Cllr Beck.
Q What happened, do tell
A At a previous meeting the Chairman shouted out disgraceful, disgraceful, disgraceful when Cllr Jepson abstained on a proposal.
Q Surely fellow councillors and members of the public considered his comments most
A Yes most certainly
Cllr Thornton (Independent) said “The word disgraceful was used 3 times and I think that was highly inappropriate. Round this table we are subject to a Code of Conduct, there were insults traded and other comments made. We have one councillor laughing and shouting across the table to other councillors and if it is coming from the Chairman I suggest he needs to apologise.”
Q What happened then
A Cllr Beck said – It was a wrong thing to do
Cllr Thornton said Thank you for the apology
Cllr Beck – IT WAS NOT AN APOLOGY
SO – The Chairman fails to apologise – There is most definitely one rule for faux aristocrats and one rule for citizens.
Lead him up the steps – OFF WITH HIS HEAD
John Ireland brought up the subject of litter between North (Nord) Anston Post Office and Narrow Lane.
Q WHAT – did he venture into enemy territory –
A Probably disorientated!
Cue – Cllr Dalton jumps straight in to promote community litter pick:
“It is very much on each agenda at the moment. It is very useful for people to let us know where they see litter. We are on a programme of encouraging young people, schools and older people to do community litter picks.”
Q Isn’t this a question of Cllr Dalton self promoting her RMBC’s projects.
A Of course, mix and mismatch RMBC and Parish Council business at every opportunity.
Cllr Thornton (Independent) pointed out that Cllr Dalton and other Labour RMBC councillors on the parish council voted for the cuts to Street Pride’s litter picking budget.
Q SO – Are we now employing children as slave labour due to budget cuts.
A Would seem so even though RMBC councillors take themselves off to expensive meals (at Aston Hall) at the taxpayer’s expense.
WHAT A BUGGERS MUDDLE – AGAIN
ANSTON TAXPAYERS LOSE OUT YET AGAIN
DROP THE BLADE – CHOP OFF THE HEAD – CLUNK INTO BASKET
The finest heckler Citizen Lewis –
“Are we now sending little lads up chimneys”
Q What was he referring to
A Oh the campaign to get schoolchildren to pick the litter of Anston
Q Were the children from Greenlands school involved
A Yes – That is where Cllr Dalton is a governor
Q Don’t we pay rates for litter picking
A Yes – Mr Lewis that finest of hecklers has a very good point
Q Did Mr Lewis complain of RMBC’s profligacy
A Yes and of the rise in council house rents and the highest rates in the borough.
Q What happened then
A See below please
VIVRE LA REVOLUTION –
And from another page of history
Q Did a lady from the Anston Nord give a history lesson to the councillors
A Oh Yes – She pointed out why the rates of Anston were so high.
Q Why are they
A Because Anston Parish Council raised money on the precept to fight the lady’s vehicular right to her cottage.
After the lady’s vehicular rights were confirmed by the court Anston Parish Council failed to take
the precept back down to the previous level.
Q How much was this
A Around £80,000 we believe
Q You mean that has been kept on the precept
A Yes and most years they have applied a 5 or 10% increase on the precept
Q Goodness me – What was behind this
A A resident causing obstruction and damage by parking cars and dustbins on the village green
Q Was this parking legal
Q Why did Anston Parish Council allow this
A Well you would have to ask them
Q Has the lady spoken about this before at Anston Parish Council
A Most definitely
Q Did she say she had been threatened with closure of her access
A She most certainly did
Q Who had done so
A Robin Stonebridge threatened to close the access to the green a number of times and the clerk threatened to close her access
Q And she has spoken of this before
A Oh yes and written to the parish council about how shameful it is that this money has not been given back to the public
Q And what was the response
A No answer was the firm reply!
Boy Wonder, Le Tricoteur – Trying to keep the lid on things refusing to let her continue
Q Didn’t Anston Parish Council go back to court to challenge the judge on his decision on costs
A They did – wasting more ratepayers money
Q What was the outcome of that
A The judge fined them on a time related indemnity basis
Q Does the lady have evidence
A Bien sur – In spades.
Q Is that the whole story
A Watch this space
Q What happened whilst the member of the public was speaking
A John Thomas Ireland, the hopeless and hapless ex chairman, got up and started wandering about Iain St.John got up and started wandering about along with several others.
Poison Ivy aka Joyce Brindley grinning not paying attention to her knitting.
Dropped a stitch, dropped her demeanour dropped her credbility
Not bothered about the excessively high rates in Anston?
Not bothered about Madame la Guillotine
Just bothered about there being enought sweeties in the communal council sweetie bag
Q Had the meeting closed
A NO – Councillors wandering about everywhere, chatting amongst themselves, taking sweeties from the bag – totally disrespecting members of the public.
Disgraceful and Shameful conduct by councillors
Chairman Beck – Le Tricoteur, had lost complete control,
Tumbrels have rolled, the Bastille has been stormed – the citizens are free (but not in Anston) North & South –
Remember – le pretend aristocrat – Darren Hughes – Jumped “out of the tumbrel” But still got the chop.
Liberte (but not to speak ere mate)
Egalite, (certainly not ere mate)
Fraternite, (only of the red sock frere’s mate)
– – It’s Anston Parish Council
Parish Council Meeting – 18 June 2012
In the run up to the Olympics
Make sure you have your go faster stripes on
Get ready – On your marks, get set, Goooooooooooooooooooooo
And they are off – Little discussion – Just reading through the agenda
Are they practicing for the Olympics , must be they have broken the 100metre dash.
Q Didn’t Beck say last time he was not going to have discussion, to save time
A Yes – But – Just let us wait and see
Q Reminiscent of old times with yesterday’s men?
A Ooooh yes – And look what happened to them
Pistol fired – Pistol fired again – Another false start – Offenders back to the blocks
Race restarted – they are off again –
Late entrant coming up on the inside
A Member of the Public – ex Parish Councillor (Labour)
“I was a bit surprised to learn that the grass cutting contract had been awarded to Cllr Baker, I am not suggesting he had prior knowledge (we think you are) certainly he could have had more favourable access in his application for the contract. I wonder why the grass cutting is not being done in-house?”
Q Does the Parish Council have the equipment for maintaining large grassed areas or the space to store such equipment.
Q Are the parish workers fully employed
A Of course they are
Q Doesn’t she know RMBC have cut the grass cutting budget throughout the Borough
A Well wouldn’t you think she would! Being a Labour supporter, she most likely supports the policy.
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm – Not a well thought out question – Is she still a magistrate? Hope she thinks her decisions out more clearly.
The Chairman, Booming Beck (Labour):- Discussions and any possible implications had taken place
Cllr Thornton (Independent) “ Can I assure you everything was above board, he was not present in any of the discussions.
The member of the public: “I take on board what you say and I think it was a very unwise thing to do.”
Q Was it all above board
A Well it most certainly seems so.
Whoops – stepped out of lane – immediate disqualification
Independents coming up strongly
No 29 Bus Service
This service has been withdrawn and understandably members of the public are upset and concerned.
Cllr Burton implied the cuts were due to privatisation and harked back to a time when the services were much better.
Q Is she wearing rose tinted glasses
A Must be – the services always left a lot to be desired prior to privatisation
Contestant stumbles and cheats by catching the bus!
Gardeners Question Time – Part 1
Weeds are Growing says Cllr Brindley
Q Oh deary dear, well they do don’t they and where is this tragedy happening
A In the gulleys and gutters of South Anston
Q Well aren’t they growing everywhere
A Yeah they are
Speed up, revving like Billy Ho – and like a flash – in comes Cllr Dalton I will take that up with RMBC
Q Now just a minute, Was this a set up so that Cllr Dalton could yet again wrest parish matters and take them to the Borough
A Well they are bezzy mates
Oh Ho Ho Ho Cllr Jepson (Independent) quick out of the blocks and over the hurdle – He had already enquired about this problem and the use of the street cleaning vehicles and GUESS WHAT FOLKES – There are the 3 vehicles for use in the Borough – Soon to be reduced to 2 – Oh dear what a disaster –
First out of the blocks takes the trophy.
Gardeners Question Time – Part 2
Oh Dear Another Tragedy – Cllr Brindley – Grass is growing on the grassed areas at the cross roads
Booming Beck – That’s RMBC Land
Oh deary deary deary – That is 2 questions about RMBC issues – I do wonder why!!
Surely we are there to discuss parish council issues – Surely time wasted on RMBC issues prevents the parish issues being discussed.
Disqualified from the race for two false starts
Code of Conduct
Councillors were asked to accept RMBC’s Code of Conduct at the last Finance Meeting.
The full council was asked to ratify this at the Parish Council Meeting
Q Was it pointed out that the Standards Committee does not exist at present
Q Was it pointed out that nobody knows what the make up or constitution is going to be
Q Was it pointed out that no rules are finalised
Q Was it pointed out the pecuniary interest rules have not been published
So what did the vote produce:-
Acceptance of a non-existing committee!!
Acceptance of a non-existing committee membership!!
Acceptance of non-existing rules!!
Acceptance of non-existing pecuniary interests!!
Ain’t this another = Buggers Muddle
Well it is Anston Parish Council ain’t it!!
All competitors wearing red socks disqualified
Independents – On the home stretch and chests out for the white tape
CROSSED THE LINE BREACHED THE TAPE
AND THE WINNER IS ——– Certainly not the people of Anston!
All puffed out – Gasping for air – Can’t get my breath!
18 June 2012 Finance Committee
Welcome to Martin Crowther – New Chair – At last! Someone who understands finance.
No Agendas available for the public
Q Why on earth not
A The clerk was asked
Q What did he say
A Well he mumbled a couple. of times (totally inaudible)
Then shouted to the public it is an omission. Can you hear me now
Wow clear and loud – so the mumbling is deliberate?
Cllr Martin Crowther the Chair
Q Wasn’t he absent when he was voted as Chair
Q Thought you had to be present
A Well yu know – It is Anston Parish Council
Q How did he do
A A bit nervous and a bit rushing
Q Think he will improve
Cllr Thornton (Independent) asked that the minutes be changed by resolution.
They were not a true record of events AGAIN. The final two lines of the minute were proposed to be deleted.
The Labour party plus Independent Labour voted against the proposal thus leaving the inaccurate recording in the minutes.
Q Why did councillors vote to retain minutes that were untrue
A Come off it – yu know it’s Anston Parish Council –
Q Is this a new thing
A Oh goodness no – integrity – forget it – this is the umpteenth time they have voted to
keep untrue recordings in the minutes. They don’t record what happened but what they would like to have happened.
INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! Get a dictionary and understand the definition councillors
Booming Booming Beck – Why was he shouting “Move we accept the Minutes”
Waaaaait a minute –
Q Wasn’t he chairing the previously meeting
A Most definitely
Q Wouldn’t he know the minutes were untrue
A Most definitely
SO – Our newly elected Chair of the Parish Council is willing to condone the false recording of minutes. Shouting “Move we accept the Minutes” To cover his mistakes!
INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! Get a dictionary and understand the definition Chairman
Awards Evening aka The Parish Council Bun Fight
When the question of the costs of this freebie for councillors came up guess what Cllr Judy Dalton said “I do not eat anything at this and I try very hard not to listen to the music”
No sarcasm then Cllr Dalton! oink oink
Booming Beck “I would ask Clive (Jepson, Independent) not to mutter under his breath when I am speaking”
Q Was this bun fight, the one the good socialists voted for us, the ratepayer, to pay for them and
Q How much do taxpayers have to cough up for their bun fight each year
Q Have they increased charges to children’s groups this year
A Oooooooh Yes
Q Have they reduced the bun fight budget
A Ooooooooh no – snouts in trough oink oink
INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! Get a dictionary and you know the rest
On the recorded vote when Cllr Jepson (Independent) abstained
Q Why did Booming Beck insult him saying “Councillor Jepson is a disgrace”
A And this from someone who’se integrity has been questioned, see above,
Q Is it acceptable for the Chairman to comment on peoples voting method –
A NO – Trying to influence councillors decisions in this manner is bullying.
Q Is the Chairman getting too big for his boots
A You Bet – should listen to more experience councillors
INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! Get a dictionary and look up bullying
Q Is this another freebie
Q Is it open to all taxpayers
A NO – just the same old lot
Q What does it cost us the taxpayer
A Around £300
Q Is a private club profiting
A You Bet
A Bar Sales
Q Was it proposed to send letters out to all Anston public houses asking if they wanted to
A Yes to make it more fair this year, finally!
Well councillors the new Standards Regime starts on the 1 July 2012 – Aint that gonna be interesting!
INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY! INTEGRITY!
Goodnight All, with Probity, Honesty etc.,
Election of New Chairman of the Finance Committee
Q Is it normal practice for the outgoing Chairperson to open the first meeting of the new session.
Q SO – Why did Judith Dalton NOT do it
A Done deal
Q When Cllr Beck asked for nominations for the new Chair, why did Cllr Dalton immediately look at Cllr Brindley, aka Poison Ivy. (Independent? Labour!)
A Don’t think you need to tell us, but go on, for the sake of completeness
Q So what happened next
A Ah! Poison Ivy immediately came in and nominated Martin Crowther
Q Was he present
Q Done deal?
A Must have been – Elected in his absence and apparently accepted in his absence
SO WHAT DO YOU THINK GOOD PEOPLE – Done Deal?
Vice Chair – Cllr Beck Elected – SO now he is Chair of the Parish, Chair of the Charity, Vice Chair of the Finance Committee.
Not bad for someone who has attended no more than 12 Parish Council Meetings!!!!!
And is only 19 years old!
Declarations of Interest
Cllrs Bridges & Dalton both declared a non-pecuniary interest in a planning application for Greenlands School.
NOW STEADY ON GIRLS – Don’t get ahead of yourselves the new declarations of interest,
Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary, have not been established yet.
REMEMBER – You are both governors of Greenlands School, in positions of control therefore you should have left the room WHEN REMINDED TO DO SO – YOU IGNORED THE ADVICE – NAUGHTY, very NAUGHTY. Not setting a good example to the children. YOU MUST PAY MORE ATTENTION TO YOUR LESSONS.
Q Why does Cllr Dalton – and others in the Labour Party press so hard to keep this drain on parish finances?
A You tell us. It’s costing taxpayers thousands of £’s per year to keep this empty building.
Q Will they put a realistic plan forward
A They have already rejected one submitted by an Independent Councillor!
Q WHO’S INTEREST ARE THIS LOT WORKING IN
A Not those of the parish that’s for sure
Skate Park Working Group
Tra Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Roll of Thunder – Enter Stage Left – Iain St.John who rejected Skate Park Observation Report submitted by Working Party Chairman, Stuart Thornton.
Q Was Iain St.John complaining
A Yes and bitterly.
A Wanting different dates for the Skate Park W Group meeting.
Q Was it Cllr St.John who requested the group to inspect the equipment
Q Did he partake in discussions on the equipment
A OH NO – He stood at the other side of the Skate Park on his own. (Billy No Mates?)
Q Why does he want alternate dates for meetings
A ‘Cos he goes to the operatics on this night
Q Why should parish matters be arranged around Iain St John’s social life?
A Of course they should not
Independent Councillor told him – MAKE THE CHOICE – OPERATICS OR THE PEOPLE OF ANSTON
Grass Verges outside, Azalea Close, Allotment Gates
Poison Ivy is upset because grass has spilled on to the footpath around the gate.
Oh! How sad.
Q Who owns the land
Q Has she been in touch with Rotherham
A No idea – Why bother us with it, it’s not Parish Council land.
Q Where does she live
A Oh on Azalea Close
Q Is that Self Interest – Or What
A As you say Another waste of parish council time
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh – It’s a secret – If you make a complaint i.e. about grass cutting and the non working fountain (which has cost the taxpayer over £3,000) –
They don’t want you to know – They put it into secret session. Ssssssssssssssssh
Q Why, what is secret about grass cutting
Anston Village Green
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh – It’s another secret – Another complaint about grass cutting – They don’t want you to know – They put it into secret session. Sssssssssssssssssssssssssssh
Q Why what is so secret about this grass cutting (again)
Q Why were Iain St.John, Judy Dalton and The Chairman (Dominic Beck) SO ADAMANT this was to be shuffled into secret session (Smacks of the East German Stasi)
A Nothing secret about grass cutting – It was all about the two personalities making the complaints. Plotting against parishioners?
Winter snow clearance
It seems RMBC want the parish council to store 20kg bags of chemicals to distribute around the village in winter.
Q Where did they decide to store this
A Computer says – They Don’t Knooooooooooow
Q Did some bright spark suggest – At The Top of Crowgate
A YES – Until it was pointed out this was at the top of a hill!!!!!!!!!! duuuuuur
Q Who is going to distribute this
A Computer says – They Don’t Knooooooooooooooooow
Q How much is it going to cost
A Computer says – They Don’t Knooooooooooooooooow
Q Did the Labour Party think it to be a very good idea
A It would appear they did
Q Are they going to go round snow shovelling
A Oh yeeeeeeeeer – Well what do you think
Code of Conduct
NALC National Association of Local Councils
Tra La Larrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Roll of Thunder – Enter Stage Left – Iain St.John
“I move we accept this Code of Conduct”
Q Has he read it
A Just wait and see dear reader
Chairman Beck begins to talk about Rotherham Standards Committee. Nothing to do with NALC you understand.
Independent councillor, Stuart Thornton, explaining, in depth that RMBC had not finalised the Standards Committee nor the Rules
Q Had he been to a meeting at the Town Hall re this topic
A Oh yes
Q SO Why did they not listen to him
A Because Chairman Cllr Dominic Beck had his own agenda
Q What was that
A Just to accept RMBC’s Standards Committee
Q Did he explain to those present that the format for the Standards Committee has not been formalised nor the rules on interests
A NO Of course not his agenda took pride of place!
Q Weren’t there two proposals on the Table
Q What happened then
A Well he ignored both of them and introduced his own proposal and put it to the vote
Q Was it carried
A Yes Red Socks and their friend Independent Labour!
What a Buggers Muddle – Passed a resolution to accept RMBC’s standards and they have not even been written yet!! Done Deal – Oh another! But this one is a bit previous.
Take note dear reader – Iain St.John (the dinosaur) making no effort to understand the matter just let’s vote – saves having to bother to read and inwardly digest and if we don’t get our way – Well just bawl and shout
Standards Committee Parish Representative
Two Nominations before the P Council
One who upholds standards, the other who has consistently failed to declare Prejudicial Interests –
Q SO Who do you think they voted for
A DO you need to ask. It was John Thomas Ireland, the hapless and hopeless ex PC Chairman – Well the Red Socks wouldn’t want anyone with competence or integrity to represent Anston Parish Council would they. Would show most of them up.
Tweet tweet – Little birdie says– The new Parish Council Chairman, Dominic Beck, stated quite categorically after the meeting, that in future councillors will not be able to discuss items at length.
Democracy – Don’t be daft – It’s Anston Parish (Stasi) Council
(Loads more to report shhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Stasi state secret.)
ANSTON PARISH COUNCIL MEETING: 21 May 2012
There was a welcome to newly elected Independent Borough Councillor – Clive Jepson. The welcome came from a member of the public – Something that the Chairman obviously forgot to announce!!!
New Chairman – Dominic Beck! Thank Goodness – About Time – Sigh of relief
Now Watch this space to see how this 19 year old Chairman performs.
Q Will he be fair – Will he bring his colleagues to account when they misbehave
A Let us watch wait and see
Election of Vice Chair: Judy Dalton obviously likes this position, nominated every year
NOTE: Labour take over complete
Ex Chairman John Thomas Ireland even stepping down from the Finance Committee – The Loyal Trooper’s profits in for a boost?
To Agree Chairman’s Allowance
A proposal put to abolish this – It is very rarely spent and certainly not on allowances.
Q Did all the Labour Members vote to keep this
A You bet
A Well don’t you remember? – They are saving up for a Chairman’s chain!
Q Don’t we have another Buggers Muddle
Q Surely – Play School fees reduced, not increased and giving grants to local groups takes priority
A Well you would think so – well wouldn’t you?
Look after the community councillors and not yourselves.
From the Public Question Time
The Village Green
The WI Jubliee Oak Tree
The oak tree planted to commemorate the WI 60 year anniversary is in a sad state.
The leader has been vandalised and the tree is not growing symmetrically
The Parish Council promised the WI that it would replace the sapling should it be vandalised.
They now appear to be dragging their heels.
Q Was this oak sapling planted properly
Q Was this sapling given the care it should have had
Q Was an adequate tree guard put in place
Q Did a tree guard eventually appear
A Yes ages after, inadequate height and cemented in disregarding the tree roots
Let us watch wait and see – keep you posted folks
Q Was it repainted last year
A Oh No – it was not repainted last year
Q Was the Parish Council told
A Yes they were a number of times
Q Did they do anything about it
A Do they ever
Q Who checks and signs the work off
A Don’t be daft, this is Anston Parish Council
Q Surely it should be the clerk
A The clerk – he is hardly ever here – Don’t like being in Anston
Q Surely a waste of our money
A Oh yes – Anston Parish Council have a history of wasting public money
Q Do you think other profligacy will come to light
A Oh yes Oh yes Oh yes – time is no barrier – keep watching folks
Q Will there be a dog bin on the village green
A Because there is no money to pay RMBC staff to empty it
Q Did our RMBC Cllrs tell us of these cuts to services
A NO just like the other cuts they haven’t told us about
Q But don’t councillors spend money on lots of jollies
A Ah well that is different!!!
Q Have they just voted 1st Class travel if going to London
A I do believe so!
Q So we just go on getting dog mess around the place
A Well two spray on signs have just been redone
Q Oh! The ones that only last a week or so
A Those are the ones
Q How cost effective is this then
A Well you tell me
So is it dog s..t on the Village Green, do s..t on your shoes so what do you think of these explanations…………………!
Overall! A rather pleasant meeting – let’s hope it lasts – It will be watched and progress reported on.
Goodnight A……………………ll Whoops slipped on the dog s..t
ANSTON ANNUAL PARISH MEETING – This is not a Parish Council Meeting.
It is a Parish Meeting for every elector in Anston. Electors can attend and vote on items affecting the Parish. The councillors have to sit with the public. The public is divided into Electors (of the Parish) and Strangers. Strangers ARE NOT ELECTORS and are not allowed to SPEAK AND VOTE.
The Chairman opened the meeting and emphasised that only Parish Electors were allowed to speak and vote. He then referred to the previous Minutes – Hey guess what – The councillors, including Strangers! had been given copies BUT none were available for the Electors.
Another Buggers Muddle – situation normal.
The Electors were demanding copies of the Minutes, at this point Mr Stonebridge (councillor) suggested the meeting be postponed. The Electors who had purposely turned out for this meeting – disagreed. The Chairman asked for a show of hands – Stay and wait for copies – or Go. The Electorate overwhelmingly voted to proceed with the meeting and for copies to be produced.
The Chairman’s Annual Report
LET US MAKE SURE – That next year the Annual Parish Report is about the Parish and NOT The Parish Council.
Building of Private Church & School on our Green Belt Land
Interestingly, the Chairman, John Ireland, appeared to be the Brethren’s Planning
Spokesman and backed this application all the way.
Well here is another revelation: The Chairman told the meeting he had presented prizes to the Brethren’s pupils – He attended this event in his capacity as Chairman of Anston Parish Council, yet failed to declare this on any discussions at council meetings, when the Brethren had submitted planning applications.
Q Were Parish Councillors aware of this
A It appears not
Q Was he biased
A Certainly – The Electors were groaning, it was so obvious
The Electors voted to ask the Parish Council to object to any future planning applications By The Brethren on Green Belt Land.
The Local Development Framework (Building of Houses on Greenbelt)
Topic discussed by Electors – They were overwhelmingly against building on Green Belt Land.
Q Do we have to keep our eye on RMBC grabbing extra Green Belt Land (to bank this for the future)
A You bet your bottom dollar we do
Q Do Electors need to attend the next consultation in November
A YES YES YES and YES. Protect our Green Belt
Free Use of the Parish Hall by RMBC Councillors
RMBC Councillors have previously voted themselves the free use of the Parish Hall for their surgeries. All other venues – South Anston, North Anston and Woodsetts – all have to be paid for.
The WI have to pay, the children’s Play School has to pay (for which they have increased the charges this year) All other groups have to pay – WHY THEN should these overpaid & under worked Borough Councillors get the Parish Hall for free?
What a mess they now look with the huge Day Glo stickers – Everyone was in agreement that this was an eyesore. The Electors asked that the Parish Council write to Network Rail to complain.
Did you know – That it is quite possible that double decker buses, which have run through the village and under the bridge for years, are going to be stopped – Suddenly the double decker buses will not go under the bridge. Lot’s of rain lately – Has the bridge shrunk?
Why did the Stranger i.e. Cllr Iain St.John, deliberately flaunt the rules by trying to influence the meeting. AND Why when told he could not speak by the Chairman and many other Electors, did he continue to try to speak over the Electors.
The Chairman had made it quite clear that only Electors could speak – A blatant and deliberate act by Cllr St.John who lives outside the parish to try to disrupt the meeting.
It was at this point that a member of the public – An Elector – got up and left the meeting.
Maybe this says it all!
THIS IS THE MEETING OF THE PARISH ELECTORS,
NO MINUTES PRODUCED, HOW THE CLERK DOES NEGLECT US,
CHAOTIC SCENES, THE CHAIRMAN BEMUSED,
ELECTORS LEFT FEELING VERY CONFUSED,
WAITING WHILST MINUTES ARE FINALLY RUN OFF,
FIASCO – QUITE NORMAL – THE ELECTORS DO SCOFF,
FIRST TIME THEY’VE DONE THIS “CORRECTLY” YOU KNOW!
MINUTES PRODUCED – THEN ON WITH THE SHOW,
IAIN ST. JOHN, AN ALIEN IS HE,
NO SPEAKING ALLOWED, BUT WHAT DO WE SEE,
ST. JOHN, NOT SO SAINTLY, IGNORING THE RULES,
ANSTON ELECTORS, DON’T TAKE US FOR FOOLS,
ALLOWING THIS MAN TO BUTT IN AND SHOUT,
ELECTORS WERE CALLING TO HAVE HIM TURNED OUT,
MAYBE NEXT YEAR THEY’LL GET IT DONE RIGHT,
THEN IT WILL BE, A REPRESENTATIVE NIGHT,
HOW MANY YEARS, HAVE OLD BOYS, NOT BEEN CORRECT?
25, MORE? – SUITED THEIR PURPOSE ? – WE SUSPECT.
Remember electors for next year: – You can put items on the Agenda that are of interest/concern to you – Contact the Clerk.
Sorry to be late folks – only just stopped laughing at the Buggers Muddle
Goodnight All – Mrs Overall
Rotherham Politics brings you this objection letter from local resident, Hilary Estrada-Haigh:
Hilary also makes these important points:
So Darren Hughes has been working behind the scenes with these people and planners, regardless of cost, both monetary and environmental, to the area he is supposed to represent.
This is the man who defected to Labour regardless of the parishioners over 1500 of whom, voted in a Conservative.
What other machinations are going on behind the scenes – How many more betrayals?
It can be reported that the plans to build a school off Todwick Road with Common Road, Anston have been withdrawn!!!!!!
The advice from officers was for rejection. The decidedly unwelcome application was being fought by the the local community. The planning application, made on behalf of a religious ‘cult’ has now been withdrawn ahead of the planning meeting scheduled for next Thursday. Hooray once again!!!! The rejection advice should be interesting, bring it to you when we have it.
Is it too much to hope that the Brethren have forsaken Rotherham for good? Wherever they turn their attention to next, perhaps they will do it without destroying more of God’s wonderful World and certainly not on Rotherham’s precious green belt!
This must be a disappointment to Darren Hughes, as he was assiduous in their cause assisting them everywhere he could! Darren Hughes is a RMBC Councillor for the Anston & Woodsetts Ward and was prepared to destroy important green belt land for a bunch of rather undesirable religious ‘cultists’, they are not called the Exclusive Brethren for nothing!
Darren’s constituents should remember this, when it comes to casting their votes this May.
A Christian group, with some pretty unchristian practises, has applied to RMBC for planning permission to build a place of worship and a school on greenbelt land at Anston. This application has received the backing of Labour or so it would appear, but for the locals, this application is distinctly unwelcome.
Firstly, this application, if successful, will be sited on greenbelt land at Anston!
This aspect alone will galvanise the community to oppose the scheme and the rumblings of increased community activity and organisation are plain for all to see. To find out more and to make your voice heard, see the Save our Greenbelt Dinnington & Anston Action Group website. Every inch of greenbelt use must be opposed, lest they just pick each piece off, one at a time! Going for the weakest first! The divide and rule tactic has been tried and didn’t work, leaving slices of the greenbelt apparently undefended will rebound on those that allow this to happen! Anston residents do this at their peril!
Clive Jepson has learned that all three Anston & Woodsetts councillors are in favour and in Darren ‘the defector’ Hughes case, has been working with them on planning issues for the last year!
Quite outrageous! Does he not understand the feelings of Anston residents? Well he wouldn’t would he? Darren lives in Catcliffe! Has he not consistently said, he opposed using greenbelt land. What a hypocrite!!!! But then, he has been a turncoat in the past!
Secondly, The nature of the applicants!
Ultimately, whoever they call themselves on a planning application, the applicants and those who will be running the school are variously called the Exclusive Brethren, the Brethren as on the original planning application or sometimes the Raven/Taylor Brethren.
It is alarming that this group should now appear to be hiding behind nominees, to confuse the casual observer at least, as to who is behind this project. Indeed, this lack of candour is a worrying development and goes to their basic honesty! It they fail on the basic honesty question, can anything they say, possibly be trusted?
Christian friends have told me, that even for a bunch of Christians they are distinctly left-field! Mostly active in the UK and Australia they have been accused of ‘cult’ practises, unfortunately, not without good reason!
The term ‘Exclusive’ refers to the fact that this group demands separation from the rest of society, even refusing to live in semi-detached properties unless the other is also occupied by a fellow adherent.
This school will only accept the children of members, so it is unlikely that any local children will be welcomed to their ‘exclusive’ school.
Their approach to education has been followed by trenchant denunciation where ever they have operated schools. Not the least for their treatment of science which tends to ignore all scientific developments since 1848! The access of students to books of all kinds is severely limited and those that are allowed them, heavily censored.
This group are apparently given to controlling their own members in similar ways that cults operate and is aimed at ensuring total domination of the individual to the group.
The Exclusive Brethren are not an open and welcoming bunch of Christians at all. Quite the reverse in fact! I find it incredible that this proposal should gather support from any Labour politician and very worrying that they appear to have been actively helping this project along, in contradiction to their public utterances on the greenbelt! But that’s Darren Hughes for you!
Where is Kevin Barron, the MP for Rother Valley constituency on this proposal? He surely cannot be in favour too! We shall see?